- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:55:44 -0500
- To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I believe this satisfies ACTION-142. Also, ACTION-117 seems to have slipped through the cracks. I believe it was dealt with and should be closed unless anyone thinks otherwise. thanks, .greg On Dec 3, 2009, at 3:22 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > Thanks Greg. This indeed clarifies. And I am fine... > > Ivan > > Gregory Williams wrote: >> On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:24 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: >> >>> Heh:-) I was asking myself exactly the same question:-) That is why I >>> asked Greg to give an example... >>> >>> I guess >>> >>> sd:Service sd:defaultDataset [ ... ] . >>> >>> (which is the current example) can also say >>> >>> sd:Service sd:defaultDataset <URI> . >>> >>> but I realized that does not necessarily sound right. <URI> is clearly >>> not the URI of the dataset itself, but a description thereof. So the >>> term's name is not really fine... >>> >>> Again, I think an example would clarify Greg's thoughts... >> >> With the new changes, the example would be: >> >> [] a sd:Service ; >> sd:defaultDatasetDescription <URI> . >> >> If the service description document contains more information (the actual dataset description) about <URI>, then you're done. If it doesn't and you want more details, you can try dereferencing <URI> to get the description. >> >> Does that clear things up? >> >> .greg >> >> > > -- > > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 15 December 2009 05:56:19 UTC