W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: Potential design space of LET/assignment

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:34:25 +0000
Message-Id: <B9BD0C8F-C4E7-44EF-B970-657A2C65BDFE@garlik.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

> The term "sophisitic" (sic) has been used.   There is no trickery  
> going on.

To be clear I was refering to calling it "syntactic sugar" when it was  
previously a distinct feature of the language.

I don't the definitions are sophistic.

I'm out of the office today and discussing stuff of this complexity on  
a phone is challenging, so I won't attempt it.

Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2009 17:33:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:57 UTC