W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs

From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:00:04 +0000
Message-ID: <492f2b0b0910300500j40d9bed5uc81cb98affbe9143@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
Cc: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
>> It would be nice to see a member submission so that it’s the users and
>> tool makers defining this.
> So I guess you didn't see me say we're doing this in a upcoming version of
> Pellet, which is a relevant tool with users who've requested this sort of
> thing.

That would apply to HermiT as well, so in that sense I do speak as
tool developer too and I can't see our users happily learning triple
syntax. Functional Style & Manchester syntax are quite popular.


> Cheers,
> Kendall

Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 306
Computing Laboratory
Parks Road
United Kingdom
+44 (0)1865 283529
Received on Friday, 30 October 2009 12:00:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:57 UTC