- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:53:14 +0000
- To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 3 Dec 2009, at 19:26, Paul Gearon wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Andy Seaborne
> <andy.seaborne@talis.com> wrote:
>>
>> DELETE { GRAPH <computerDivision> { ?x ?p ?o }
>> INSERT { GRAPH <servicesDivision> { ?x ?p ?o } }
>> WHERE
>> { GRAPH <computerDivision>
>> { ?x foaf:name "John Smith" ; ?x ?p ?o }
>> }
>>
>> then it is ambiguous as to what the WHERE applies to.
>
> But wasn't the ; separator supposed to identify where multiple DELETEs
> belonged to the same operation and where they were separate
> operations? Or do I have that completely backwards? People may have
> been talking about multiple operations the whole time and I didn't get
> it. All the same, now I'm considering separate operations in a single
> request, I'm thinking that ; would have been better as the operation
> separator.
I was thinking of it as multiple operations.
- Steve
--
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
+44(0)20 8973 2465 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10
9AD
Received on Friday, 4 December 2009 10:53:53 UTC