- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:06:34 +0000
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 6 Nov 2009, at 08:58, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Proposed response:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:ldodds-query-1
Re. FILTER( EXISTS { ... })
I think that at the F2F that agreed that we wouldn't allow for EXISTS
inside FILTER for this reason, and because there was some reluctance
to have BGP expressions in the FILTER syntax.
If that matches the minutes, and/or other people's recollection it
might be worth pointing that out, as it answers the concern.
- Steve
>
> to:
>
> "Comments on SPARQL 1.1 WD 20091022"
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2009Oct/0000.html
>
> Andy
>
--
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
+44(0)20 8973 2465 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10
9AD
Received on Friday, 6 November 2009 12:07:10 UTC