- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:25:17 -0400
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- CC: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>
>> for a
>> CONSTRUCT { GRAPH ... } operation from users and that would be a
>> natural extension.
>
> Seems sensible.
FWIW, we've been doing this in Glitter for a few months now. See
http://www.thefigtrees.net/lee/blog/2009/07/constructing_quads.html .
> The barrier to doing this is not SPARQL itself but the lack of a standard serialization for the output of named graph CONSTRUCT.
Yes, this exactly.
> SPARQL/Data anyone?
> :-)
No thanks :)
Lee
>
> Andy
>
>> - Steve
>>
>> --
>> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
>> 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
>> +44(0)20 8973 2465 http://www.garlik.com/
>> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
>> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10
>> 9AD
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2009 16:26:11 UTC