Greg, if there is a general agreement in the WG, we should record that somewhere (next meeting?) and I can then initiate the process of asking for the namespaces and to populate it with the right RDFa files. I explicitly cc-d Birte here to see if the OWL 'side' of the world sees any issues with that (I do not expect, but who knows...) Ivan On 12/18/2009 09:31 PM, Gregory Williams wrote: > On Dec 3, 2009, at 12:49 PM, Ivan Herman wrote: > >> Just on a very technical and minor note: after discussions with the SW >> CG, there are common URI-s now for the entailment regimes, see >> >> http://www.w3.org/ns/entailment/ >> >> I would be happy to set up a similar set of generic URI-s for the >> profiles (including DL). > > Adding the profiles would help me in describing them in the service description document. Also, is there an rdfs:Class that these belong to? In the SD document I've been describing them as belonging to sd:EntailmentRegime, but if they are defined outside of the SD document, perhaps they should have their own type? (Similarly for the profiles.) > > thanks, > .greg > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Saturday, 19 December 2009 06:02:01 UTC