W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] OWL Direct Semantics added

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:02:28 +0100
Message-ID: <4B2C6C74.8010406@w3.org>
To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
CC: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk

if there is a general agreement in the WG, we should record that
somewhere (next meeting?) and I can then initiate the process of asking
for the namespaces and to populate it with the right RDFa files.

I explicitly cc-d Birte here to see if the OWL 'side' of the world sees
any issues with that (I do not expect, but who knows...)


On 12/18/2009 09:31 PM, Gregory Williams wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2009, at 12:49 PM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> Just on a very technical and minor note: after discussions with the SW
>> CG, there are common URI-s now for the entailment regimes, see
>> http://www.w3.org/ns/entailment/
>> I would be happy to set up a similar set of generic URI-s for the
>> profiles (including DL).
> Adding the profiles would help me in describing them in the service description document. Also, is there an rdfs:Class that these belong to? In the SD document I've been describing them as belonging to sd:EntailmentRegime, but if they are defined outside of the SD document, perhaps they should have their own type? (Similarly for the profiles.)
> thanks,
> .greg


Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Saturday, 19 December 2009 06:02:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:58 UTC