- From: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:10:19 +0100
- To: Simon Schenk <sschenk@uni-koblenz.de>
- Cc: Luke Wilson-Mawer <luke.wilson-mawer@garlik.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi, On 20 Oct 2009, at 09:14, Simon Schenk wrote: > Am Freitag, den 16.10.2009, 15:32 +0100 schrieb Luke Wilson-Mawer: >> * Some of the 'Notes' in this section seem to be more like issues, >> but don't reference issue numbers. E.g. 'Is DELETE too verbose?', >> 'Is MODIFY syntax required?' > > Created ISSUES as follows and replaced the corresponding notes: > > ISSUE-45 > Can INSERTS, DELETES, and other 'subupdates' be nested inside SELECT > queries? > > ISSUE-46 > Can INSERTS, DELETES, and other 'subupdates' be nested inside update > language queries? > > ISSUE-47 > Is MODIFY syntax required? > > ISSUE-48 > Is DELETE too verbose? There was also discussions regarding a MOVE keyword, based on the previous SPARUL review by Luke and myself http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009JulSep/0073.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009JulSep/0069.html Best, Alex. > > Cheers, > Simon > > > > -- > Simon Schenk | ISWeb | Uni Koblenz > http://isweb.uni-koblenz.de > http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~sschenk > Five sentences policy: http://five.sentenc.es/ > -- Dr. Alexandre Passant Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Galway :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 11:10:58 UTC