ISSUE-84 (Conrad): UML diagrams in the Structural Specification are not quite UML
UFDTF: Agenda Mon Dec 3rd
UFDTF Minutes - Monday 26th Nov
issues being discussed: REPORTED vs ACCEPTED
owl rational datatype
ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1
- Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1
- Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1
Axiom prioritization
Working Drafts, Recommendations, Working Group Notes etc.
All about imports
Minutes 28/11/2007
ISSUE-82 (Conrad): Metamodel diagrams in Syntax document should be aligned with OMG ODM
ISSUE-81 (reification, negative assertions): reification unwise in negative property assertions
ISSUE-80 (DL-Lite): REPORTED: DL-Lite
- Re: ISSUE-80 (DL-Lite): REPORTED: DL-Lite
- RE: ISSUE-80 (DL-Lite): REPORTED: DL-Lite
- Re: ISSUE-80 (DL-Lite): REPORTED: DL-Lite
- proposal - Fragments redux (unifying the threads under Issues 75-80)
ISSUE-79 (EL++): REPORTED: EL++ Variants
ISSUE-78 (OWL LitEL++): OWL-Lite as EL++
ISSUE-77 (Horn-SHIQ): Extending Horn-SHIQ
ISSUE-76 (DLP): REPORTED: DLP
ISSUE-75 (Non tractable fragments): REPORTED: Tractable fragments that are not tractable
UFDTF F2F goals???
- UFDTF Metamodeling Document
Annotation test cases
Agenda for teleconference Wednesday November 28th, 2007
ACTION-29 is done
Differences between rdfs:Datatype vs owl:DataRange
ACTION-28 completed
UFDTF on the Face to Face Agenda?
UFDTF - who are we writing for
- Re: UFDTF - who are we writing for
- Re: UFDTF - who are we writing for
- RE: UFDTF - who are we writing for
- Re: UFDTF - who are we writing for
UFDTF on Zakim in half an hour
ISSUE-74 (XSD URIs for facets): REPORTED: Use the xsd namespace for the facet names
UFDTF - today's teleconference details (not Zakim!)
foaf/OWL
UFDTF: Agenda for Monday 12 noon EST
UDFTF Who reads our documents
Rich Annotations
Minutes 20071121
owl:imports vs xinclude
CURIEs - ISSUE-14
Re: Datatype Defaulting in OWL
XInclude
ISSUE-73 (infinite universe): REPORTED: Should owl:Thing be necessarily infinite?
- Re: ISSUE-73 (infinite universe): REPORTED: Should owl:Thing be necessarily infinite?
- Re: ISSUE-73 (infinite universe): REPORTED: Should owl:Thing be necessarily infinite?
ISSUE-72 (Annotation Semantics): REPORTED: lack of annotation semantics is not backwardly compatible
ISSUE-71 (datarange language range): REPORTED: create datarange of literals matching given language range
ISSUE-70 (lang tag datarange): REPORTED: create datarange of literals with given language tag
ISSUE-69 (punning): REPORTED: punning is incompatible with OWL Full
ISSUE-68 (nonmonotonic mapping): REPORTED: mapping rules are non-monotonic
ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise
- RE: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise
- Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise
- RE: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise
- Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise
- Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise
- RE: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise
- Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise
- RE: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise
- Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise
ISSUE-66 (mapping inconsistencies): REPORTED: inconsistencies between mapping rules
- RE: ISSUE-66 (mapping inconsistencies): REPORTED: inconsistencies between mapping rules
ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary
- RE: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary
- Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary
ISSUE-64 (obj-prop-chain rep): REPORTED: object property chains in triples: confusion of list with property
ISSUE-63 (full semantics): REPORTED: Defining an RDFS compatible semantics
further issues from HP
ISSUE-62 (OWL 1.0 SAS comments): REPORTED: OWL 1.0 S&AS comments from webont
ISSUE-61 (OWL 1.0 Overview editorial): REPORTED: OWL 1.0 Overview editorial from webont comments
ISSUE-60 (wine ): REPORTED: wine in OWL Guide is not culturally universal
ISSUE-59 (OWL 1.0 Guide editorial): REPORTED: OWL 1.0 Guide editorial from webont comments
ISSUE-58 (OWL 1.0 Ref editorial): OWL 1.0 Ref editorial from webont comments
ISSUE-57 (OWL 1.0 Errata): REPORTED: Folding in OWL 1.0 Errata
issues derived from OWL 1.0 comments list and errata ....
Agenda for teleconference Wednesday November 21st, 2007
Action 14 clean up minutes
ISSUE-56 (repairsomerdf): Specify standard "repairs" for moving select RDF documents to OWL?
UFDTF regular meeting time
UFDTF minutes (draft)
UFDTF - UFDs and Webont
vote for F2F2 location and time (by 21 November)
procedural: can tf assign actions
UFDTF from tech plenary session
agenda for today's UFDTF
bug in tracker
A brief primer on Qnames and URIs
- Re: A brief primer on Qnames and URIs
Telecon for referencing externally defined datatypes
- Re: Telecon for referencing externally defined datatypes and re: UFDTF
- Re: Telecon for referencing externally defined datatypes
- Re: Telecon for referencing externally defined datatypes
[admin] links to archive in Issue-5 are broken
raw minutes of today's meeting
F2F2 in Washington DC, early April 2008
Datatype support implementation matrix
Introduction (other part)
ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - real vs XSD
Agenda for TC 2007.11.14
ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - rounding errors
ISSUE-55 (owl:class): owl:class v. rdfs:class
- Re: ISSUE-55 (owl:class): owl:class v. rdfs:class
- RE: ISSUE-55 (owl:class): owl:class v. rdfs:class
- Re: issue-55 (owl:class): owl:class v. [sic] rdfs:class
wiki page on fragments extended
Proliferation of types
Open issues dealing with user defined datatypes
Some wiki additions
ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - lots of choice, no guidance
ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - decidability on merging
- Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - decidability on merging
ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes -decidability - datatype group?
ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - unimplemented incomplete design
- Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - unimplemented incomplete design
- Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - unimplemented incomplete design
ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes
abbreviated IRIs - ISSUE-14 (was Re: owl minutes)
Proposals for hosting F2F2
Visual Rendering of OWL ontologies?
OWL telecon minutes now on wiki
UFDTF - on stale docs
ISSUE-5: REPORTED: Doubts about n-ary datatypes
ISSUE-5: REPORTED: Doubts about n-ary datatypes
draft minutes of UFDTF 7th Nov
Re: ISSUE-28 (multiple facets): REPORTED: Multiple facet restrictions per data range
Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- OWL 1.1 design goals
- Re: OWL 1.1 design goals
- RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
- Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals
Re: ISSUE-11 (datatype facets): REPORTED: Specification of which facet is being restricted in a datatype restriction is missing
Discussion of anonymous individuals versus skolems
Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping
- Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping
- Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping
- Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping
Re: ISSUE-15 (ontology names): REPORTED: Ontologies should not be required to include a URI
Re: ISSUE-14 (CURIES): REPORTED: Proposal to base abbreviated URIs on CURIES not QNAMES
ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping
- Re: ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping
- RE: ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping
RDF mapping of OWLClass, Datatype...
Re: ISSUE-8 (dataproperty chains): REPORTED: add chains ending with data properties)
Related to ISSUE-6
Side issue: Table layout
Re: ISSUE-8 (dataproperty chains): REPORTED: add chains ending with data properties
- Re: ISSUE-8 (dataproperty chains): REPORTED: add chains ending with data properties)
[TF:RA] Rich annotation work (perhaps) taken up by OWLWG
agenda for UFDTF
Agenda for teleconference Wednesday November 7th, 2007
Rich Annotation System Proposal
Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday October 31, 2007
informative vs normative docs etc....
Agenda requests: Issues we can decide?
- Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide?
- Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide?
- Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide?
N-ary data predicates (see ISSUE-5)
Re: Rich Annotations Use Cases
- Re: Rich Annotations Use Cases
- Re: Rich Annotations Use Cases
- Re: Rich Annotations Use Cases
- Re: Rich Annotations Use Cases
User defined datatypes & XML Schema WG
ISSUE-53 (Linear inequality between two data types): Need for arbitrary inequality conditions on two (or more) data types
ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- FW: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
- Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences
low-level syntax issues
RE: Introductions (F2F Meeting)
classes as instances (was Re: comments on RDF mapping)
Fwd: ISSUE-51 (Language Name): Name of the Poduct
Re: User Facing Documents
- Re: User Facing Documents
- Re: User Facing Documents
ISSUE-51 (Language Name): Name of the Poduct
resolution of editorial issues
comments on RIF BLD from OWL WG
Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
- Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
- Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
- Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
- Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
- Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
- Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
- Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
- Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
- Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
- Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
- Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
- Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
- Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
- Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
- Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
- Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)