- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:04:08 +0000
- To: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I thought that we were following the convention that when an issue is first added to the issues list it is "REPORTED", and discussion is limited to clarification. I believed that the chairs were gradually deciding which issues to mark as "ACCEPTED" at which point more free-ranging discussion might take place. If we have been following this convention it has been more followed in the breach. e.g. As far as I can see we have established that there are differences of opinion about the metamodel and ISSUE-82 is, indeed, an issue. I believe we have (informally) agreed that the editors will reflect this appropriately in the appropriate document. Until the chairs are happy to declare the issue fully open, by marking it as ACCEPTED, I have been trying not to muddy the waters further by making any comment. (Obviously shortly after an issue has been raised it can be helpful for some comments so we know who stands where, and roughly why ...) Jeremy
Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 16:04:37 UTC