Re: CURIEs - ISSUE-14

I just got word from the XHTML2 group that the Curie document[1] _is_
going through rec track, they actually plan to have it as last call this
year. Ie, it is 'not' moribund after all, in contrast to what I wrote in
[2]. I guess that pretty much closes ISSUE-14.

Ivan

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/curie
[2] http://www.w3.org/mid/474C29DA.9020502@w3.org

Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> Ivan Herman wrote:
>> Jeremy, I am not sure which 'two XHTML2.0 WDs' you were
>> referring additionally to [1] and [2]. To the best of my knowledge, [1]
>> supersedes any other CURIE-related work in the XHTML2 WG.
>>
> 
> 
>         http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-role/#sec_3.1.
> 
>         http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/WD-xhtml-access-20071115/#sec_3.1.
> 
> (note the TR version of the above does not include the pertinent text)
> 
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf