- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@miscoranda.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:07:21 +0000
- To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: "SW-forum Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "public-owl-wg Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On Nov 22, 2007 8:51 AM, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote: > > So, either one needs a kind of macro, or some sort of type coercion. > > Can you GRDDL RDF/XML? If so, you could add a type decoration > transform. Yes, you can. That's clever! This is helping me to restate my goal, too... I think what I want is a way to say that the range of a property is xsd:string UNION xsd:integer, but that instances of xsd:string may be transformed through some atoi-ish type coercion (possibly via GRDDL?) to xsd:integer. The aeq route seems to be kinda getting at this, but might be different. So in the GRDDL case, the way to specify this would be to say that all documents in which my property, e.g. numberOfFish, appears may be transformed using the GRDDL transform... but that means that we need another new thing: a way to say "all documents in which this property appears". And there are further complications in that you have to mandate the RDF/XML serialisation to apply the GRDDL transform, and so on. -- Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2007 09:07:30 UTC