- From: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:35:53 -0500 (EST)
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org, jjc@hpl.hp.com
- Cc: skw@hp.com
Jeremy wrote: >Stuart thought that the View from the Outside tech plenary session might >be relevant to our TF. > >I found the slides: >http://www.w3.org/2007/11/TPAC/view-from-outside.pdf I guess the "outside" referred to here is outside of the W3C standards community. However, the panelists are all web developers. As such, they are outside of the user community that I represent. I represent those who want to capture their domain knowledge in OWL, not those who build tools to capture that knowledge or build UIs to interface with it (others in the WG represent those communities). Before someone says it... mine is not an anti-web perspective. IMO - much of the usefulness of the click-able web comes from the ability of non-web developers to participate by publishing into it directly without the need for esoteric software or specialized web experts. Our standard needs to be useful to both those who build OWL tools and those who author OWL content. Since these are two different audiences and the documents aimed at them have different goals, it makes a lot of sense to break the work product of this WG into different documents or document sets split along these lines. This is what WebOnt did and what the deliverables in our charter reflect. -Evan -Evan
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2007 16:36:39 UTC