- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:23:59 -0500 (EST)
- To: boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Equivalences are a bit different, as an n-way equivalence can be turned into n-1 binary equivalences (triples) and thus the need for "special" RDF syntax for them is lessened. peter From: "Boris Motik" <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk> Subject: Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 18:24:48 -0000 > > Hello, > > There are other n-ary constructs in the functional spec that are mapped > into binary constructs in the RDF: equivalences on classes > disjointness and equivalences on properties, and sameAs and disjointFrom > on individuals > > It might make sense to broaden the discussion to these features as well > > Thus, you could view the problem as "whether the RDF mapping should > always preserve the arity of the construct in the functiona > spec". > > Regards, > > Boris > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2007 18:35:45 UTC