ISSUE-66 (mapping inconsistencies): REPORTED: inconsistencies between mapping rules from OWL Working Group Issue Tracker on 2007-11-20 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from November 2007)

From: OWL Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:52:50 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20071120145251.05F41BEF0@nelson.w3.org>

ISSUE-66 (mapping inconsistencies): REPORTED: inconsistencies between mapping rules

http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/

Raised by: Jeremy Carroll
On product: 


The OWL 1.0 mapping rules only mapped from the abstract syntax to the triples.

The member submission defines two sets of mapping rules (going both ways).

Presumably there is some relationship required between the two sets of mapping rules.

This relationship is neither stated nor proved.

Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2007 14:52:55 UTC