Fwd: ISSUE-51 (Language Name): Name of the Poduct

oops... meant this to go to the list.

-Rinke

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
> Date: 2 november 2007 13:06:03 GMT+01:00
> To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
> Subject: Re: ISSUE-51 (Language Name): Name of the Poduct
>
> On 2 nov 2007, at 12:54, Jim Hendler wrote:
>>
>> s/poduct/product -- problem is I couldn't figure out how to change  
>> it in the issue tracker once I made the typo -- I'd have no  
>> objection if someone could fix it.
>
> I just fixed it. If you select the issue by clicking on its name in  
> the list. The tracker will show a page with issue details. There is  
> an 'Edit this issue' link on the right.
> For some reason, this link is not present on the page that confirms  
> any changes made to the issue.
>
> Best,
> 	Rinke
>
>
>> On Nov 2, 2007, at 7:51 AM, OWL Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ISSUE-51 (Language Name): Name of the Poduct
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/
>>>
>>> Raised by: James Hendler
>>> On product:
>>>
>>> This should be obvious, but I thought we should get it in the  
>>> issue list before the first documents go out.  When this WG was  
>>> proposed, there was a lot of pushback against the name OWL 1.1  
>>> (some people didn't like version numbers at all, some thought this  
>>> was the wrong version number, and there were a couple of other  
>>> comments in various mailing lists).  Our charter is careful and  
>>> never calls the output of the group OWL 1.1, it simply uses that  
>>> term to refer to the member submission.
>>>
>>> The WG has to decide affirmatively whether to go forward with the  
>>> 1.1 name or whether to use another name (DLOWL, OWL 2, OWL).  In  
>>> addition, since the charter stresses backward compatibility, we'll  
>>> probably have to make sure there is some documentation of how to  
>>> refer to the older version (which was never called OWL 1.0)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research,  
>> would it?." - Albert Einstein
>>
>> Prof James Hendler				http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler
>> Tetherless World Constellation Chair
>> Computer Science Dept
>> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ----------------------------------------------
> Drs. Rinke Hoekstra
>
> Email: hoekstra@uva.nl   Skype:  rinkehoekstra
> Phone: +31-20-5253499    Fax:   +31-20-5253495
> Web:   http://www.leibnizcenter.nl/users/rinke
>
> Leibniz Center for Law,         Faculty of Law
> University of Amsterdam,           PO Box 1030
> 1000 BA  Amsterdam,            The Netherlands
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>

----------------------------------------------
Drs. Rinke Hoekstra

Email: hoekstra@uva.nl   Skype:  rinkehoekstra
Phone: +31-20-5253499    Fax:   +31-20-5253495
Web:   http://www.leibnizcenter.nl/users/rinke

Leibniz Center for Law,         Faculty of Law
University of Amsterdam,           PO Box 1030
1000 BA  Amsterdam,            The Netherlands
----------------------------------------------

Received on Friday, 2 November 2007 12:06:48 UTC