- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:30:28 -0500 (EST)
- To: hoekstra@uva.nl
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
I believe that there is no problem with the syntax document, but that there is a minor problem with the RDF mapping document, which I have documented at http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Talk:Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs#Transformation_to_Triples Feel free to open an issue for this. peter From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl> Subject: RDF mapping of OWLClass, Datatype... Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 15:21:56 +0100 > > Hi All, > > Not sure if this is a real issue-issue. I've posted the same text on > the RDF mapping talk page [1] > > Table 2 [2] translates only the URI's of entities such as Datatype, > OWLClass, ObjectProperty etc. but not the entities themselves; e.g. > owlClassURI is mapped onto: > > owlClassURI rdf:type owl:Class > > However, the Syntax document does introduce these elements as part of > the syntax. > Is it not more appropriate to map for instance > > OWLClass ( owlClassURI ) > > onto > > owlClassURI rdf:type owl:Class > > I am aware this is not a small change, as the Syntax document will > need to be revised, and perhaps it is not necessary. Perhaps, even, it > would be enough to include a mapping from a.o. OWLClass statements to > rdf:type owl:Class statements in Table 2. > > Nonetheless, it is not very 'clean' if the Functional Syntax way of > stating that some element is an OWLClass differs from the way in which > the RDF Mapping does the same. > > Best, > > Rinke > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Talk:Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs > [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs#transformation-to-triples > > ---------------------------------------------- > Drs. Rinke Hoekstra > > Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra > Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 > Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.nl/users/rinke > > Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law > University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 > 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands > ---------------------------------------------- > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2007 14:43:13 UTC