- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:14:55 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: conrad.bock@nist.gov, public-owl-wg@w3.org
On Nov 30, 2007, at 4:37 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> >> Agreed, however does it make sense for there to be a storage >> mechanism for OWL specifically, rather than building on whatever >> storage mechanism is chosen for RDF? >> >> -Alan > Absolutely. Tools need to be able to store OWL axioms and facts as > entities different from RDF triples. In fact, building an OWL > structural specification on top of an RDF storage methodology is > probably the wrong thing to do. Because... -Alan
Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 10:15:42 UTC