- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:58:35 +0000
- To: Vojtech Svatek <Svatek@vse.cz>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
On 13 Nov 2007, at 00:44, Vojtech Svatek wrote: [snip] > All such 'pattern-oriented' annotation types I have in mind are, in > Bijan's > terms, 'canIgnore' ones Yep! but they can be very important for roundtripping through a tool. For example, if I use one of Protege4s refactoring or "closure" help commands, I'd like to *know* that it came from a protege action rather than hand modeling. > (although I am also interested in e.g. uncertainty > extensions - but that's another story). > > My plan now is to have a bit of discussion with some 'patterns' > guys first, > offline, and then return with some consolidated proposal. Bijan, > would it > be OK if I then add a few bullets to [1] at some point? Of course! Please do! Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2007 00:57:14 UTC