- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 02:25:52 -0400
- To: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 3 November 2007 06:26:09 UTC
On Nov 2, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Rinke Hoekstra wrote: > Secondly, my question is whether and where we should draw the line > between: > a) making the OWL-somename *specification* more accessible to > users, and > b) providing *educational* material explaining the consequences of > the technicalities in the spec. Hi Rinke, I'm not exactly sure how one draws the line here. Personally, I don't see work on educational material as harmful, as long as it is well done and doesn't compromise other goals of the group. I don't see the latter happening currently, so I guess I'm taking a wait and see attitude towards the efforts of the people who plan to work on the documentation. We will need to assess the work they do, and it would certainly help if they have input from all of us about what we think is important to have in the documentation. To that end, maybe clarifying the distinction you are trying to make could help. One way to make this and other points on documentation might be to identify some from other analogous projects that people have found to be particularly useful to them or know to have been useful to others, and perhaps some examples that have elements that we want to avoid. -Alan
Received on Saturday, 3 November 2007 06:26:09 UTC