- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:18:08 +0000
- To: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- CC: "'Web Ontology Language (OWL) Working Group WG'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Boris Motik wrote: > I would just like to point out that one of the design goals of OWL 1.1 DL was to clean up the > specification and bring it closer to what OWL DL users and implementors are dealing with in practice. This was very, very illuminating. Is there a list of all such design goals, where can I find it? === It seems to me that if this is motivating much of the group, and it is echoed by say Ian: [[ In fact the semantics of annotations in OWL DL and OWL full are already different in practice: whatever the spec might say, all OWL DL tools/systems that I am aware of treat annotations as being completely void of semantics ]] which suggests that rather than maintaining alignment between DL and Full, maybe this group is about formalising the differences ... === Are we doing couple counselling or divorce? Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 10:18:39 UTC