- From: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 11:56:22 -0500 (EST)
- To: jjc@hpl.hp.com, bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Bijan wrote: >Now your list of plausible reasons include several that I'd voice as >possibilities, but this sort of language seems chilling. But, >apparently, trying to be clear about my concerns is also deemed so >outre that...well...people's flabbers were gasted. So, I guess I'll >wait until there are documents or text on the table to raise any >specific concerns. As the person who's flabber was 'gasted, let me comment... It didn't hurt. Really. So there is no reason to avoid additional occurences of this in future. In fact, your frankness both at the telecon and in subsequent related emails has been very helpful in understanding your actions, which I had previously found enigmatic and frustrating. If you do want to avoid future cases of overwhelming astonishment though, continued clear expression of your concerns would be the way. -Evan Evan K. Wallace Manufacturing Systems Integration Division NIST
Received on Friday, 9 November 2007 16:57:32 UTC