- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:35:57 -0400 (EDT)
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
There are two issues that have to do with the low-level syntax of OWL 1.1, namely ISSUE-13 (quotation in strings and literals) http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/13 and ISSUE-14 (using CURIES) http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/14 These issues talk directly about the functional syntax, and thus appear to be easy to resolve, and don't depend much on other considerations. However, there is some involvement with RDF and n-triples / Turtle. I think that a move to CURIES is a great idea. (Why hasn't Turtle moved to CURIES, by the way?) I think that any reasonable resolution to the quotation issue would be fine. Comments? Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research
Received on Friday, 2 November 2007 14:46:31 UTC