- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 21:49:39 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Before starting to focus on specific doccuments, I wonder if we could discuss what goals/styles/audiences we would like to reach. The focus of that discussion, at least to start with, would be to collect the possibilities, rather than arguing that one or the other choice is undesirable. -Alan On Nov 6, 2007, at 3:42 PM, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > start time half hour before telecon, Wed. > > 1730 UTC, 09:30AM (West US), 12:30PM (East US), > 17:30 (London), 18:30 (Paris) > > 1) time of next meeting > suggestion: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2007Nov/0114 > London 20:00 > New York 15:00 > Silicon Valley 12:00 > Korea 05:00 Fri :( > > > 2) which docs could we/should we start now? > > a) overview ala 1.0 > Deb has indicated enthusiasm for this one > > b) overview ala member submission > Bijan and Peter have indicated enthusiasm > > c) use cases and requirements with traceability matrix linking > requirements and OWL 1.1 features > Jeremy and Vipul have indicated enthusiasm > > ============================== > End of agenda > ============= > > Some points about item 2: > ========================= > I think there is an obvious conflict between doing a) and b) i.e. > while b) could be done as the opening section of an a) type > document; it makes no sense to do both as two separate docs. > > I am unclear whether Peter or Bijan is prepared to own (b) if > necessary. > > I believe Deb is prepared to own (a) but would prefer clarity that > this is understood to be a WD route document before she starts. > > Vipul and I are keen to start working on (c) and believe that the > final format can be sorted out later. > > > Possible considerations under 2 > > - who do we want to read and review the documents? > - who do we want to be writing the documents? > > > Deliberately not on agenda > ========================== > but still open > > What is the format in which we expect public to review these > documents: > Jeremy has argued for Working Draft > Bijan for on Wiki > > > Jeremy > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2007 20:58:52 UTC