- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:08:07 +0000
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
3) no design for determining how to ensure decidability
(maybe Jeff Pan's design?)
It is important in OWL DL that the reasoning task is strongly decidable.
(Personally I don't find this a compelling feature of OWL DL, but I
understand that it is an unbudging design criterion)
With n-ary datatypes it appears to be possible to describe arithmetic
relationships, built using addition, mutliplication and inequalities.
In XML Schema Datatypes as supported by OWL 1.0, it is possible to
describe unbounded integers amongst other types.
Thus with n-ary datatypes it appears to be possible to construct
arbitrary diophantine equations, and Hilbert's tenth problem then tells
us that we need to consider how to ensure decidability.
(This argument is spelt out in greater detail in the Turner and Carroll
technical report).
Jeff Pan, both in his thesis, and in the Pan and Horrocks paper, is
aware of this issue, and provides a design called datatype groups which
is motivated by trying to ensure decidability of the description logic
reasoner, with a clean modular interface to a datatype reasoner, that
deals with the numeric problems.
This work is not used, or referenced, by the member submission design,
which hence seems to loose decidability - this may also help to explain
why there are no implementations.
References
==========
Pan PhD
http://dl-web.man.ac.uk/thesis8.php
Pan and Horrocks
Jeff Z. Pan and Ian Horrocks. Web ontology reasoning with datatype
groups. In Dieter Fensel, Katia Sycara, and John Mylopoulos, editors,
Proc. of the 2003 International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2003),
number 2870 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 47-63. Springer,
2003.
Turner and Carroll
http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2007/HPL-2007-37.html
Received on Monday, 12 November 2007 20:08:36 UTC