- From: Kashyap, Vipul <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:21:17 -0500
- To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Jim Hendler" <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
- Cc: <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
> I think we would do well to 1) have a lightweight introduction > (whether separate or not is a different issue) and 2) to make the > normative documentation more accessible and 3) to encourage a rich > documentation ecosystem that survives and thrives beyond the working > group. It's clear that, at least at the W3C, a lot of the proposed > activity belongs in SWEO: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/ > > """The scope of SWEO group includes: > the development and collection of use and business cases, stemming > from both user and vendor companies, and documenting the value of > Semantic Web technologies > identifying possible vertical markets and application areas for the > Semantic Web > production of clear guidelines for tutorials, presentations, > teaching > materials, FAQ-s, etc, targeted at different audiences""" > > Sounds like our TF telecon today :) Not really. At least so far, SWEO has focused at the "Business User" whereas we will be focusing on other users as well... "Domain Specific Informaticians" "Enterprise Architect", .... etc. So it is more of a 30,000 foot level picture as opposed more detailed user guide and requirements driven design approach that we are proposing. ---Vipul The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information.
Received on Monday, 26 November 2007 19:21:31 UTC