- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 16:57:25 +0000
- To: "Novacek, Vit" <vit.novacek@deri.org>
- Cc: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, <rector@cs.man.ac.uk>
On 1 Nov 2007, at 16:41, Novacek, Vit wrote: >> The question would be where adding specific properties to the OWL >> spec is >> appropriate Yes. >> versus those properties being defined in some standard ontology. This is an alternative. If this group does it, it's a bit moot or rather an implementation decision which way we go. But having a better set of predefined annotation properties so tools can support them specifically is a win, IMHO. For example, we should look at what it takes to have a tighter integration with SKOS (at the annotation level). >> I don't know what the answer is. Would be interested in seeing the >> list of >> candidate properties... > > Good point - I'll consider this, try to list possible options > (mainly within > the motivation part of the would-be proposal), prepare some more > concrete > initial comments as soon as possible after I'll be back in the office [snip] Looking forward. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2007 16:55:58 UTC