- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:16:08 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
On 15 Nov 2007, at 12:49, Jeremy Carroll wrote: [snip] > With Peter's e-mail, I am confident that we can have: > > - in-line XSD datatypes with our own syntax > - in-line XSD datatypes using their syntax (but probably not in RDF/ > XML; the xml literals in RDF/XML are defined via exclusive XML > Canonicalization, that is not compatabilte with shipping XML Schema > fragments) > - external references to XSD datatypes with an explicit id attribute > [Hence allowing an ontology to be shipped in two files, one > containing all the datatypes] > > The only missing desiderata was external references to arbitrary > XSD datatypes, which does depend on XML Schema's SCD doc. > I personally think we should be prepared to cut our losses at that > point. I'm happy to cut it there. This would be a great improvement on the status quo. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2007 13:18:06 UTC