- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 18:26:17 +0000
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Sorry, to get carried away with snark! Ian said he got lost as to the actual point, so here's it all stripped out. My preferences for short names are: "owl" and "owl11" in that order, with the first strongy prefered. But really, I'm happy to defer to chair's arbitrary choice. I don't think there's any huge fallout to the short name. Worst case scenario we claim "hysterical raisons" and move on. *Unless* the short name forces on us a change of URI prefix. I'm quite against that and don't want that settled by this decision, which would argue pretty strongly for "owl". Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Saturday, 3 November 2007 18:26:39 UTC