- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:23:07 +0000
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
This was an area where I have significant doubts about the member submission design. I'll try and give a high-level overview of the doubts: 1) unimplemented 2) no design for declaring n-ary datatypes 3) no design for determining how to ensure decidability (maybe Jeff Pan's design?) 4) Jeff Pan's design does not ensure that decidability is preserved on merging 5) Problems with decidability on merging are *very* likely, (or require new research to show how to avoid them) 6) Various decidable subsets are possible, but no basis for making choices 7) rounding errors behave very differently from in traditional numeric applications - hence a solved problem (rounding) becomes an unsolved problem I think that will do. I'll have a go at sending an e-mail message on each of these topics, and also on what I think the high-level user goal is, and my preferred design as to how to meet that. A further nine e-mails :(. I am not sure of the time line for that. Jeremy
Received on Monday, 12 November 2007 16:23:31 UTC