public-owl-wg@w3.org from November 2007 by date

Friday, 30 November 2007

• Re: Question on RDFS3.0 (was Re: proposal - Fragments redux ) Alan Wu
• Re: proposal - Fragments redux (unifying the threads under Issues 75-80) Ian Horrocks
• RE: Extending OWL DL vocabulary (was UFDTF Metamodeling Document) Conrad Bock
• ISSUE-84 (Conrad): UML diagrams in the Structural Specification are not quite UML OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Jim Hendler
• RE: Extending OWL DL vocabulary (was UFDTF Metamodeling Document) Conrad Bock
• Re: proposal - Fragments redux (unifying the threads under Issues 75-80) Jim Hendler
• RE: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Conrad Bock
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Jeremy Carroll
• RE: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Conrad Bock
• RE: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Conrad Bock
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• UFDTF: Agenda Mon Dec 3rd Jeremy Carroll
• RE: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Conrad Bock
• UFDTF Minutes - Monday 26th Nov Jeremy Carroll
• RE: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Conrad Bock
• RE: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Conrad Bock
• RE: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Conrad Bock
• issues being discussed: REPORTED vs ACCEPTED Jeremy Carroll
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Uli Sattler
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Kashyap, Vipul
• RE: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposal - Fragments redux (unifying the threads under Issues 75-80) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Michael Smith
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: bug in tracker Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Elisa F. Kendall
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: bug in tracker Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Boris Motik
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Question on RDFS3.0 (was Re: proposal - Fragments redux ) Ivan Herman
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Alan Ruttenberg

Thursday, 29 November 2007

• owl rational datatype Michael Smith
• RE: ISSUE-82 (Conrad): Metamodel diagrams in Syntax document should be aligned with OMG ODM Conrad Bock
• ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Elisa F. Kendall
• RE: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Conrad Bock
• RE: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Conrad Bock
• Axiom prioritization Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: proposal - Fragments redux (unifying the threads under Issues 75-80) Alan Wu
• Re: proposal - Fragments redux (unifying the threads under Issues 75-80) Carsten Lutz
• Re: proposal - Fragments redux (unifying the threads under Issues 75-80) Jim Hendler
• Working Drafts, Recommendations, Working Group Notes etc. Jeremy Carroll
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Conrad Bock
• All about imports Bijan Parsia
• Re: Minutes 28/11/2007 Jeff Z. Pan
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposal - Fragments redux (unifying the threads under Issues 75-80) Carsten Lutz
• Re: ISSUE-79 (EL++): REPORTED: EL++ Variants Carsten Lutz
• Re: Minutes 28/11/2007 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: proposal - Fragments redux (unifying the threads under Issues 75-80) Jim Hendler
• Re: proposal - Fragments redux (unifying the threads under Issues 75-80) Bernardo Cuenca Grau
• Re: ISSUE-80 (DL-Lite): REPORTED: DL-Lite Bernardo Cuenca Grau
• Re: ISSUE-79 (EL++): REPORTED: EL++ Variants Bernardo Cuenca Grau
• proposal - Fragments redux (unifying the threads under Issues 75-80) Jim Hendler

Wednesday, 28 November 2007

• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-80 (DL-Lite): REPORTED: DL-Lite Carsten Lutz
• Re: ISSUE-79 (EL++): REPORTED: EL++ Variants Carsten Lutz
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Minutes 28/11/2007 Jeff Z. Pan
• Re: ISSUE-78 (OWL LitEL++): OWL-Lite as EL++ Bernardo Cuenca Grau
• RE: ISSUE-82 (Conrad): Metamodel diagrams in Syntax document should be aligned with OMG ODM Boris Motik
• RE: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Conrad Bock
• RE: ISSUE-80 (DL-Lite): REPORTED: DL-Lite Giorgos Stoilos
• Re: ISSUE-79 (EL++): REPORTED: EL++ Variants Bernardo Cuenca Grau
• RE: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Conrad Bock
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-82 (Conrad): Metamodel diagrams in Syntax document should be aligned with OMG ODM OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Conrad Bock
• Re: ISSUE-76 (DLP): REPORTED: DLP Bernardo Cuenca Grau
• RE: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Conrad Bock
• ISSUE-81 (reification, negative assertions): reification unwise in negative property assertions OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-80 (DL-Lite): REPORTED: DL-Lite Bernardo Cuenca Grau
• RE: ISSUE-66 (mapping inconsistencies): REPORTED: inconsistencies between mapping rules Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-78 (OWL LitEL++): OWL-Lite as EL++ Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-75 (Non tractable fragments): REPORTED: Tractable fragments that are not tractable Jim Hendler
• ISSUE-80 (DL-Lite): REPORTED: DL-Lite OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-79 (EL++): REPORTED: EL++ Variants OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-78 (OWL LitEL++): OWL-Lite as EL++ OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-77 (Horn-SHIQ): Extending Horn-SHIQ OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-76 (DLP): REPORTED: DLP OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-75 (Non tractable fragments): REPORTED: Tractable fragments that are not tractable OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Conrad Bock
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-56 (repairsomerdf): Specify standard "repairs" for moving select RDF documents to OWL? Ian Horrocks
• Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL 1.1 design goals Ian Horrocks
• UFDTF Metamodeling Document Conrad Bock
• UFDTF F2F goals??? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Bijan Parsia
• Annotation test cases Jeremy Carroll
• OWL 1.1 design goals Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Bijan Parsia
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday November 28th, 2007 Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 27 November 2007

• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Bijan Parsia
• RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Boris Motik
• Agenda for teleconference Wednesday November 28th, 2007 Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary Ian Horrocks
• ACTION-29 is done Jeremy Carroll
• Re: CURIEs - ISSUE-14 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary Bijan Parsia
• Differences between rdfs:Datatype vs owl:DataRange Jeremy Carroll
• ACTION-28 completed Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Minutes 20071121 Ian Horrocks
• Re: CURIEs - ISSUE-14 Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary Ivan Herman
• Re: UFDTF on the Face to Face Agenda? Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary Ian Horrocks
• Re: CURIEs - ISSUE-14 Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary Ivan Herman
• Re: CURIEs - ISSUE-14 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: CURIEs - ISSUE-14 Ivan Herman
• Re: CURIEs - ISSUE-14 Ivan Herman
• Re: CURIEs - ISSUE-14 Michael Smith
• Re: UFDTF - who are we writing for Ivan Herman
• Re: CURIEs - ISSUE-14 Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Ivan Herman

Monday, 26 November 2007

• Re: UFDTF - who are we writing for Bijan Parsia
• Re: CURIEs - ISSUE-14 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: RDFS 3.0 and Oracle OWL Prime (was Re: wiki page on fragments extended) Alan Wu
• RE: UFDTF - who are we writing for Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: UFDTF - who are we writing for Bijan Parsia
• RE: UFDTF - who are we writing for Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: UFDTF - who are we writing for Jim Hendler
• Re: UFDTF - who are we writing for Bijan Parsia
• RE: UFDTF - who are we writing for Conrad Bock
• Re: UFDTF - who are we writing for Jim Hendler
• UFDTF on the Face to Face Agenda? Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: UFDTF - who are we writing for Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise Ian Horrocks
• Re: UFDTF - who are we writing for Bijan Parsia
• UFDTF - who are we writing for Jim Hendler
• UFDTF on Zakim in half an hour Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE-74 (XSD URIs for facets): REPORTED: Use the xsd namespace for the facet names OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: RDFS 3.0 and Oracle OWL Prime Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDFS 3.0 and Oracle OWL Prime Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Rich Annotations Bijan Parsia
• Re: RDFS 3.0 and Oracle OWL Prime (was Re: wiki page on fragments extended) Jim Hendler
• Re: Rich Annotations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise Ian Horrocks
• RDFS 3.0 and Oracle OWL Prime (was Re: wiki page on fragments extended) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Rich Annotations Bijan Parsia
• Re: UFDTF - today's teleconference details (not Zakim!) Jeremy Carroll
• UFDTF - today's teleconference details (not Zakim!) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Rich Annotations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Rich Annotations Bijan Parsia
• Re: CURIEs - ISSUE-14 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Rich Annotations Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 25 November 2007

• Re: foaf/OWL Jim Hendler
• Re: foaf/OWL Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: foaf/OWL Jim Hendler
• Re: Rich Annotations Bijan Parsia
• Re: Rich Annotations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Rich Annotations Bijan Parsia
• Re: Rich Annotations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• mustUnderstand (was Re: Rich Annotations) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Rich Annotations Bijan Parsia
• Re: Rich Annotations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Rich Annotations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: owl:imports vs xinclude Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Rich Annotations Bijan Parsia
• Re: Rich Annotations Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 23 November 2007

• Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise Alan Ruttenberg

Saturday, 24 November 2007

• Re: Minutes 20071121 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: CURIEs - ISSUE-14 Alan Ruttenberg
• foaf/OWL Alan Ruttenberg

Friday, 23 November 2007

• Re: Datatype Defaulting in OWL Harry Halpin
• UFDTF: Agenda for Monday 12 noon EST Jeremy Carroll
• UDFTF Who reads our documents Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Rich Annotations Bijan Parsia
• Re: Rich Annotations Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Rich Annotations Bijan Parsia
• Re: CURIEs - ISSUE-14 Jeremy Carroll
• Rich Annotations Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise Jeremy Carroll
• Minutes 20071121 Rinke Hoekstra

Thursday, 22 November 2007

• Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise Alan Ruttenberg
• owl:imports vs xinclude Jeremy Carroll
• CURIEs - ISSUE-14 Jeremy Carroll
• Sorry! (Re: Datatype Defaulting in OWL) Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-73 (infinite universe): REPORTED: Should owl:Thing be necessarily infinite? Bijan Parsia
• RE: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise Giorgos Stoilos
• RE: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-73 (infinite universe): REPORTED: Should owl:Thing be necessarily infinite? Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise Giorgos Stoilos
• Re: Datatype Defaulting in OWL Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Datatype Defaulting in OWL Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Datatype Defaulting in OWL Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Datatype Defaulting in OWL Bijan Parsia
• Re: Datatype Defaulting in OWL Bijan Parsia
• Re: unnamed datatypes in RDF/XML Alan Ruttenberg

Wednesday, 21 November 2007

• Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-73 (infinite universe): REPORTED: Should owl:Thing be necessarily infinite? Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-73 (infinite universe): REPORTED: Should owl:Thing be necessarily infinite? Uli Sattler
• RE: ISSUE-28 (multiple facets): REPORTED: Multiple facet restrictions per data range Boris Motik
• Draft minutes 2007.11.14 Conrad Bock
• Re: ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping Rinke Hoekstra
• XInclude Rinke Hoekstra
• RE: ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping Rinke Hoekstra
• ISSUE-73 (infinite universe): REPORTED: Should owl:Thing be necessarily infinite? OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-66 (mapping inconsistencies): REPORTED: inconsistencies between mapping rules Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE-66 (mapping inconsistencies): REPORTED: inconsistencies between mapping rules Boris Motik
• RE: ISSUE-64 (obj-prop-chain rep): REPORTED: object property chains in triples: confusion of list with property Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-66 (mapping inconsistencies): REPORTED: inconsistencies between mapping rules Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-64 (obj-prop-chain rep): REPORTED: object property chains in triples: confusion of list with property Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise Jeremy Carroll
• Re: unnamed datatypes in RDF/XML Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-69 (punning): REPORTED: punning is incompatible with OWL Full Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary Boris Motik
• Re: unnamed datatypes in RDF/XML Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: unnamed datatypes in RDF/XML Alan Ruttenberg

Tuesday, 20 November 2007

• Re: unnamed datatypes in RDF/XML Michael Smith
• RE: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise Boris Motik
• RE: ISSUE-66 (mapping inconsistencies): REPORTED: inconsistencies between mapping rules Boris Motik
• RE: ISSUE-64 (obj-prop-chain rep): REPORTED: object property chains in triples: confusion of list with property Boris Motik
• ISSUE-72 (Annotation Semantics): REPORTED: lack of annotation semantics is not backwardly compatible OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: further issues from HP Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE-71 (datarange language range): REPORTED: create datarange of literals matching given language range OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-70 (lang tag datarange): REPORTED: create datarange of literals with given language tag OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-69 (punning): REPORTED: punning is incompatible with OWL Full OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-68 (nonmonotonic mapping): REPORTED: mapping rules are non-monotonic OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-66 (mapping inconsistencies): REPORTED: inconsistencies between mapping rules OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-64 (obj-prop-chain rep): REPORTED: object property chains in triples: confusion of list with property OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-63 (full semantics): REPORTED: Defining an RDFS compatible semantics OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• further issues from HP Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE-62 (OWL 1.0 SAS comments): REPORTED: OWL 1.0 S&AS comments from webont OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-61 (OWL 1.0 Overview editorial): REPORTED: OWL 1.0 Overview editorial from webont comments OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-60 (wine ): REPORTED: wine in OWL Guide is not culturally universal OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-59 (OWL 1.0 Guide editorial): REPORTED: OWL 1.0 Guide editorial from webont comments OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-58 (OWL 1.0 Ref editorial): OWL 1.0 Ref editorial from webont comments OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-57 (OWL 1.0 Errata): REPORTED: Folding in OWL 1.0 Errata OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• issues derived from OWL 1.0 comments list and errata .... Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday November 21st, 2007 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: unnamed datatypes in RDF/XML Jeremy Carroll
• Re: unnamed datatypes in RDF/XML Bijan Parsia
• Re: unnamed datatypes in RDF/XML Alan Ruttenberg

Monday, 19 November 2007

• Re: unnamed datatypes in RDF/XML Bijan Parsia
• unnamed datatypes in RDF/XML Jeremy Carroll
• Agenda for teleconference Wednesday November 21st, 2007 Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - use cases ISSUE-53 Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - use cases ISSUE-53 Kashyap, Vipul
• RE: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - use cases ISSUE-53 Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - use cases ISSUE-53 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: wiki page on fragments extended Jim Hendler

Sunday, 18 November 2007

• Action 14 clean up minutes Alan Ruttenberg
• ISSUE-56 (repairsomerdf): Specify standard "repairs" for moving select RDF documents to OWL? OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - use cases ISSUE-53 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: abbreviated IRIs - ISSUE-14 (was Re: owl minutes) Alan Ruttenberg

Friday, 16 November 2007

• Re: Telecon for referencing externally defined datatypes Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Telecon for referencing externally defined datatypes Carsten Lutz
• Re: Telecon for referencing externally defined datatypes Michael Smith
• Re: Telecon for referencing externally defined datatypes Alan Ruttenberg
• UFDTF regular meeting time Jeremy Carroll
• UFDTF minutes (draft) Jeremy Carroll
• Input to UFD scope/issues (Was: UFDTF from tech plenary session) Martin Dzbor
• Re: facets, XSD, SCD, external datatypes (was Re: A brief primer on Qnames and URIs) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: XML Schema datatypes Jeremy Carroll
• Re: XML Schema datatypes Bijan Parsia
• Re: XML Schema datatypes Carsten Lutz
• Re: agenda for today's UFDTF Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: facets, XSD, SCD, external datatypes (was Re: A brief primer on Qnames and URIs) Michael Smith

Thursday, 15 November 2007

• Re: XML Schema datatypes ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: XML Schema datatypes Jeff Z. Pan
• Re: UFDTF - UFDs and Webont Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: UFDTF - UFDs and Webont Deborah L. McGuinness
• UFDTF - UFDs and Webont Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• vote for F2F2 location and time (by 21 November) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: procedural: can tf assign actions Jeremy Carroll
• procedural: can tf assign actions Jeremy Carroll
• Re: agenda for today's UFDTF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: UFDTF from tech plenary session Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: UFDTF from tech plenary session ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• UFDTF from tech plenary session Jeremy Carroll
• agenda for today's UFDTF Jeremy Carroll
• Re: facets, XSD, SCD, external datatypes (was Re: A brief primer on Qnames and URIs) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: facets, XSD, SCD, external datatypes (was Re: A brief primer on Qnames and URIs) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Telecon for referencing externally defined datatypes Jeremy Carroll
• facets, XSD, SCD, external datatypes (was Re: A brief primer on Qnames and URIs) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: XML Schema datatypes Jeremy Carroll
• Re: XML Schema datatypes Jeremy Carroll
• Re: XML Schema datatypes Bijan Parsia
• Re: A brief primer on Qnames and URIs Bijan Parsia
• Re: A brief primer on Qnames and URIs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: XML Schema datatypes Carsten Lutz
• Re: XML Schema datatypes Bijan Parsia
• bug in tracker Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [admin] links to archive in Issue-5 are broken Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: XML Schema datatypes Carsten Lutz
• Re: XML Schema datatypes Carsten Lutz
• Re: Telecon for referencing externally defined datatypes and re: UFDTF Jim Hendler
• Re: [admin] links to archive in Issue-5 are broken Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: XML Schema datatypes Bijan Parsia
• A brief primer on Qnames and URIs Bijan Parsia

Wednesday, 14 November 2007

• Telecon for referencing externally defined datatypes Michael Smith
• [admin] links to archive in Issue-5 are broken ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• raw minutes of today's meeting Alan Ruttenberg
• UFDTF dial in details confirmed Alan Ruttenberg
• XML Schema datatypes Carsten Lutz
• Re: Datatype support implementation matrix Bijan Parsia
• Re: OWL telecon minutes (for 7 Nov) now on wiki Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL telecon minutes (for 7 Nov) now on wiki ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: UFDTF dial in details Bijan Parsia
• Re: Datatype support implementation matrix Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL telecon minutes (for 7 Nov) now on wiki Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL telecon minutes (for 7 Nov) now on wiki Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• F2F2 in Washington DC, early April 2008 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Datatype support implementation matrix Bijan Parsia
• UFDTF dial in details Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Agenda for TC 2007.11.14 Deborah L. McGuinness
• Introduction (other part) Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 13 November 2007

• Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - decidability on merging Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - decidability on merging Carsten Lutz
• Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - decidability on merging Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - decidability on merging Carsten Lutz
• ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - real vs XSD Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - decidability on merging Jeremy Carroll
• Agenda for TC 2007.11.14 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - decidability on merging Alan Ruttenberg
• ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - rounding errors Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - decidability on merging Jeremy Carroll
• what to do for suggested annotations (was Re: Rich Annotations Use Cases) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Rich Annotations Use Cases Bijan Parsia
• Re: Rich Annotations Use Cases Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• needs for roundtripping Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: issue-55 (owl:class): owl:class v. [sic] rdfs:class Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-55 (owl:class): owl:class v. [sic] rdfs:class Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-55 (owl:class): owl:class v. rdfs:class Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: ISSUE-55 (owl:class): owl:class v. rdfs:class Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-55 (owl:class): owl:class v. rdfs:class Alan Ruttenberg
• ISSUE-55 (owl:class): owl:class v. rdfs:class OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping Jim Hendler
• wiki page on fragments extended Jim Hendler
• Proliferation of types Jim Hendler
• Re: Visual Rendering of OWL ontologies? Elisa F. Kendall
• Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping Jim Hendler
• RE: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping Boris Motik
• RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Boris Motik
• Re: Rich Annotations Use Cases Bijan Parsia
• Re: Rich Annotations Use Cases Vojtech Svatek
• Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - decidability on merging Alan Ruttenberg

Monday, 12 November 2007

• Open issues dealing with user defined datatypes Michael Smith
• Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - unimplemented incomplete design Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - unimplemented incomplete design Carsten Lutz
• Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - unimplemented incomplete design Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - unimplemented incomplete design Carsten Lutz
• Some wiki additions Alan Ruttenberg
• ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - lots of choice, no guidance Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - decidability on merging Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes -decidability - datatype group? Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - unimplemented incomplete design Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - use cases ISSUE-53 Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - use cases - preferred design Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes Jeremy Carroll
• abbreviated IRIs - ISSUE-14 (was Re: owl minutes) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Visual Rendering of OWL ontologies? Bijan Parsia
• Re: Visual Rendering of OWL ontologies? Anne Cregan
• Re: Visual Rendering of OWL ontologies? Alan Ruttenberg

Sunday, 11 November 2007

• Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev) Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping Ian Horrocks
• Re: Related to ISSUE-6 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Visual Rendering of OWL ontologies? Anne Cregan
• Re: Proposals for hosting F2F2 Anne Cregan

Saturday, 10 November 2007

• Proposals for hosting F2F2 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Visual Rendering of OWL ontologies? Anne Cregan
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Ian Horrocks
• RE: Visual Rendering of OWL ontologies? Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Ivan Herman
• Visual Rendering of OWL ontologies? Anne Cregan
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Alan Ruttenberg

Friday, 9 November 2007

• Re: draft minutes of UFDTF 7th Nov ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• OWL telecon minutes now on wiki Sandro Hawke
• UFDTF - on stale docs Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Carsten Lutz
• RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Boris Motik
• Re: draft minutes of UFDTF 7th Nov Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Giorgos Stoilos
• RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Giorgos Stoilos
• RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Boris Motik
• Re: draft minutes of UFDTF 7th Nov Bijan Parsia
• Re: Owl 1.1 DL and OWL 1.1 Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Carsten Lutz
• RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Giorgos Stoilos
• RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Giorgos Stoilos
• Re: draft minutes of UFDTF 7th Nov Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE-5: REPORTED: Doubts about n-ary datatypes Carsten Lutz
• ISSUE-5: REPORTED: Doubts about n-ary datatypes Carsten Lutz
• draft minutes of UFDTF 7th Nov Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 8 November 2007

• RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Conrad Bock
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Carsten Lutz
• RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Boris Motik
• RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Conrad Bock
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Carsten Lutz
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Carsten Lutz
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Carsten Lutz
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Carsten Lutz
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Carsten Lutz
• RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Uli Sattler
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr

Wednesday, 7 November 2007

• Re: agenda for UFDTF Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-28 (multiple facets): REPORTED: Multiple facet restrictions per data range Boris Motik
• RE: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping Uli Sattler
• Re: ISSUE-11 (datatype facets): REPORTED: Specification of which facet is being restricted in a datatype restriction is missing Boris Motik
• Discussion of anonymous individuals versus skolems Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-8 (dataproperty chains): REPORTED: add chains ending with data properties) Uli Sattler
• Re: Rich Annotations Use Cases Bijan Parsia
• Re: Rich Annotations Use Cases Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: organizational pages for the Wiki Bijan Parsia
• Re: organizational pages for the Wiki Alan Ruttenberg
• organizational pages for the Wiki Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-8 (dataproperty chains): REPORTED: add chains ending with data properties) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-8 (dataproperty chains): REPORTED: add chains ending with data properties) Uli Sattler
• Re: ISSUE-15 (ontology names): REPORTED: Ontologies should not be required to include a URI Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ISSUE-15 (ontology names): REPORTED: Ontologies should not be required to include a URI Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ISSUE-14 (CURIES): REPORTED: Proposal to base abbreviated URIs on CURIES not QNAMES Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ISSUE-14 (CURIES): REPORTED: Proposal to base abbreviated URIs on CURIES not QNAMES Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Owl 1.1 DL and OWL 1.1 Full Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Owl 1.1 DL and OWL 1.1 Full Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-8 (dataproperty chains): REPORTED: add chains ending with data properties) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping Jim Hendler
• ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: RDF mapping of OWLClass, Datatype... Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RDF mapping of OWLClass, Datatype... Rinke Hoekstra
• Owl 1.1 DL and OWL 1.1 Full Jim Hendler
• Re: next week's UFDTF next call Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-8 (dataproperty chains): REPORTED: add chains ending with data properties) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Related to ISSUE-6 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-8 (dataproperty chains): REPORTED: add chains ending with data properties) Jim Hendler
• Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide? Jim Hendler
• Related to ISSUE-6 Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday November 7th, 2007 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Side issue: Table layout Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ISSUE-8 (dataproperty chains): REPORTED: add chains ending with data properties Uli Sattler
• Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide? Bijan Parsia
• Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: annotating axioms Bijan Parsia
• annotating axioms Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: next week's UFDTF next call Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Rich Annotation System Proposal Bijan Parsia
• Re: Rich Annotation System Proposal Achille Fokoue
• Re: Rich Annotation System Proposal Bijan Parsia
• Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide? Bijan Parsia

Tuesday, 6 November 2007

• Re: Rich Annotation System Proposal Achille Fokoue
• [TF:RA] Rich annotation work (perhaps) taken up by OWLWG Bijan Parsia
• Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide? Bijan Parsia
• Re: next week's UFDTF next call Bijan Parsia
• Re: Rich Annotation System Proposal Bijan Parsia
• Re: next week's UFDTF next call ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide? Jim Hendler
• Re: Rich Annotation System Proposal Achille Fokoue
• agenda for UFDTF Jeremy Carroll
• RE: next week's UFDTF next call Kashyap, Vipul
• next week's UFDTF next call Jeremy Carroll
• Agenda for teleconference Wednesday November 7th, 2007 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev) Alan Ruttenberg
• Rich Annotation System Proposal Bijan Parsia
• Re: User Facing Documents Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday October 31, 2007 Deborah L. McGuinness
• informative vs normative docs etc.... Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Rich Annotations Use Cases Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide? Bijan Parsia
• Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide? Ian Horrocks
• Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Choosing a "short name" for our working group pubs Ivan Herman
• Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Choosing a "short name" for our working group pubs Alan Ruttenberg

Monday, 5 November 2007

• Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide? Bijan Parsia
• Re: UFDTF next call Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide? Ian Horrocks
• Re: UFDTF next call ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Agenda requests: Issues we can decide? Bijan Parsia
• Re: UFDTF next call ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: User Facing Documents Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• UFDTF next call Jeremy Carroll
• Re: User Facing Documents Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: User Facing Documents Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: resolution of editorial issues Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Rinke Hoekstra
• RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Kashyap, Vipul
• RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Kashyap, Vipul
• RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: quoting conventions in email Jeremy Carroll
• N-ary data predicates (see ISSUE-5) Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Choosing a "short name" for our working group pubs Jeremy Carroll
• quoting conventions in email Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Bijan Parsia
• Re: Documentation goals Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Alan Ruttenberg

Sunday, 4 November 2007

• Re: User defined datatypes & XML Schema WG Bijan Parsia
• Re: Rich Annotations Use Cases Bijan Parsia
• Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev) Ian Horrocks
• Re: Rich Annotations Use Cases Ian Horrocks
• Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev) Ian Horrocks
• Re: User Facing Documents Bijan Parsia
• Re: Choosing a "short name" for our working group pubs Jim Hendler
• RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Kashyap, Vipul
• RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Jim Hendler
• RE: ISSUE-53 (Linear inequality between two data types): Need for arbitrary inequality conditions on two (or more) data types Kashyap, Vipul
• User defined datatypes & XML Schema WG Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-53 (Linear inequality between two data types): Need for arbitrary inequality conditions on two (or more) data types Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev) Alan Ruttenberg
• ISSUE-53 (Linear inequality between two data types): Need for arbitrary inequality conditions on two (or more) data types OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Alan Ruttenberg

Saturday, 3 November 2007

• Re: Choosing a "short name" for our working group pubs Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Choosing a "short name" for our working group pubs Bijan Parsia
• RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: Choosing a "short name" for our working group pubs Bijan Parsia
• Re: Choosing a "short name" for our working group pubs Ivan Herman
• Documentation goals Alan Ruttenberg

Friday, 2 November 2007

• RE: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Bijan Parsia
• FW: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: User Facing Documents Jim Hendler
• Re: Choosing a "short name" for our working group pubs Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Choosing a "short name" for our working group pubs Jim Hendler
• ISSUE-52 (Explanations): Specification of OWL equivalences and rewriting rules for explaining inferences OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: User Facing Documents Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Choosing a "short name" for our working group pubs Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: classes as instances Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: classes as instances (was Re: comments on RDF mapping) Jeremy Carroll
• low-level syntax issues Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Introductions (F2F Meeting) Sahay, Ratnesh
• Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: User Facing Documents Bijan Parsia
• Re: User Facing Documents Jim Hendler
• Re: comments on RDF mapping Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• classes as instances (was Re: comments on RDF mapping) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: comments on RDF mapping Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: User Facing Documents Bijan Parsia
• Fwd: ISSUE-51 (Language Name): Name of the Poduct Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: User Facing Documents Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-51 (Language Name): Name of the Poduct Jim Hendler
• Re: comments on RDF mapping Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-51 (Language Name): Name of the Poduct OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: comments on RDF mapping Bijan Parsia
• Re: comments on RDF mapping Ivan Herman
• resolution of editorial issues Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• comments on RIF BLD from OWL WG Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 1 November 2007

• Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev) Alan Ruttenberg
• Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: comments on RDF mapping Bijan Parsia
• RE: comments on RDF mapping Novacek, Vit
• Re: comments on RDF mapping Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: comments on RDF mapping Novacek, Vit
• Possible meeting conflicts next two weeks - Please indicate regrets ASAP Alan Ruttenberg
• Choosing a "short name" for our working group pubs Alan Ruttenberg

Last message date: Friday, 30 November 2007 23:25:28 UTC