- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:51:52 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Carsten Lutz <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>, Michael Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>, Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, public-owl-wg <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, ewallace@cme.nist.gov
Doesn't this just mean we have to be a little more careful where we
put the namespace?
<owl:Class ID="ActionTime"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
<owl:equivalentClass>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#hasTime"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:parseType="Literal">
<xs:simpleType xmlns:my="http://example.org/myDatatypes"
> <--- the namespace is here now
<xs:restriction base="my:precision3">
<xs:minInclusive value="305.200" />
<xs:maxInclusive value="310.199" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</owl:someValuesFrom>
</owl:Restriction>
</owl:equivalentClass>
</owl:Class>
BTW, Bijan, why would you create a different data type for each time
interval you annotate, rather than defining a single "interval"
datatype and then using a bunch of values from it?
-Alan
On Nov 19, 2007, at 4:44 PM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> In today's telecon I took an action to explain some issues.
>
> I wrote a Wiki page
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/XSDinRDFXML
>
> which might do this.
>
> I try to iilustrate an OWL 1.0 restriction on a datarange defined
> using an in-line unnamed XML Schema datatype.
>
> Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2007 05:58:21 UTC