- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:42:32 +0000
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
start time half hour before telecon, Wed. 1730 UTC, 09:30AM (West US), 12:30PM (East US), 17:30 (London), 18:30 (Paris) 1) time of next meeting suggestion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2007Nov/0114 London 20:00 New York 15:00 Silicon Valley 12:00 Korea 05:00 Fri :( 2) which docs could we/should we start now? a) overview ala 1.0 Deb has indicated enthusiasm for this one b) overview ala member submission Bijan and Peter have indicated enthusiasm c) use cases and requirements with traceability matrix linking requirements and OWL 1.1 features Jeremy and Vipul have indicated enthusiasm ============================== End of agenda ============= Some points about item 2: ========================= I think there is an obvious conflict between doing a) and b) i.e. while b) could be done as the opening section of an a) type document; it makes no sense to do both as two separate docs. I am unclear whether Peter or Bijan is prepared to own (b) if necessary. I believe Deb is prepared to own (a) but would prefer clarity that this is understood to be a WD route document before she starts. Vipul and I are keen to start working on (c) and believe that the final format can be sorted out later. Possible considerations under 2 - who do we want to read and review the documents? - who do we want to be writing the documents? Deliberately not on agenda ========================== but still open What is the format in which we expect public to review these documents: Jeremy has argued for Working Draft Bijan for on Wiki Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 20:43:05 UTC