ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 1997 by author

Alain LaBont/e'/

• Re: Translated IUC10 Web pages: Experimental Results (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Translated IUC10 Web pages: Experimental Results (Wednesday, 5 February)

Albert Lunde

• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: A broken browser (Thursday, 2 January)

Alejandro Rivero

• Re: A broken browser (Wednesday, 8 January)

Alex Duncan

• Cookies (Monday, 17 February)

Alex Lizarraga

• testing...... (Saturday, 18 January)

Alexei Kosut

• RE: Apache Group (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Apache Groupy (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: origin server vs. proxy with full URL (Friday, 27 December)
• Re: A broken browser (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Wednesday, 1 January)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Wednesday, 1 January)

Allan M. Schiffman

• Revised S-HTTP draft (Thursday, 27 March)

Andrew Daviel

• Re: New Issue: Incompatiblity between caching needs and persistant connections. (Friday, 21 March)
• http-equiv and new http headers (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Cookies and cache (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Cacheing encrypted objects (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Metadata proliferation (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: Metadata proliferation (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: copyright issues for proxy caches and archival services (Saturday, 8 March)

Andy Norman

• Administrivia: getting off this list (Thursday, 20 March)

Anselm Baird_Smith

• Content-Range and Caching Proxies (Tuesday, 4 March)
• RE: Comments on the new cookie draft (Monday, 24 February)
• Apache and HTTP/1.1 (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: question on 14.9.4, no-cache directive in requests (Tuesday, 7 January)
• question on 14.9.4, no-cache directive in requests (Monday, 6 January)
• Re: Cache-Control directive, semantics (Monday, 6 January)

Ari Luotonen

• Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: pipelining vs. deferred content (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: 305 Use proxy (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Cookie Question (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: Cookie Question (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Cookie Question (Friday, 14 February)

Balint Nagy Endre

• Re: Fact-checking: do any in-service proxy caches ever ignore Expires? (Tuesday, 18 March)

Ben Laurie

• Re: pipelining vs. deferred content (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: pipelining vs. deferred content (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt) (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt) (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: What method for Location? (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: Apache Group (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Apache Group (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: ucbvax.berkeley.edu: host not found) (fwd) (Saturday, 28 December)

Benjamin Franz

• RE: Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show? (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Comments on the new cookie draft (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: errata for cookie spec (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: errata for cookie spec (Wednesday, 5 February)

Blake Winton

• Re: HTTP response version, again (Thursday, 2 January)

Bob Briscoe

• HTTP/1.1 - Retry-after for 3xx as well as 503? (Tuesday, 4 March)

Brian Behlendorf

• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)

carl f GRIFFITH

• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)

Cary Timar

• Internet Draft http-versions-00 (Friday, 28 February)

Chris Lilley

• Re: Translated IUC10 Web pages: Experimental Results (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header (Saturday, 11 January)
• Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header (Friday, 10 January)

Chuck Murcko

• Re: Apache and HTTP/1.1 (Friday, 21 February)

Cynthia Clark

• Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt) (Wednesday, 26 March)

Dan Connolly

• HTML "include": see WD-object [was: HTTP Connection Management] (Thursday, 27 March)
• URI or URL? [was: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached] (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached (Wednesday, 12 March)
• PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: [Fwd: SEC - Protocol names for security protocols] (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: PEP and new methods (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Cookie Question (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PEP draft for review] (Thursday, 13 February)
• [Fwd: Re: PEP draft for review] (Tuesday, 11 February)
• PEP draft for review (Tuesday, 4 February)

Daniel DuBois

• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Thursday, 2 January)

Dave Kristol

• Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: Section 10.1.1 Combining Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2 (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: unverifiable transactions (was: Unidentified subject!) (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Section 10.1.1 Combining Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2 (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: RFC2109 addition... (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Section 10.1.1 Combining Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2 (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: cookie Port summary (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: cookie Port summary (Monday, 24 March)
• cookie Port summary (Monday, 24 March)
• RE: new cookie draft (Saturday, 22 March)
• RE: Issues with the cookie draft (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: new cookie draft (Friday, 21 March)
• Secure cookies survey (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Issues with the cookie draft (Thursday, 20 March)
• cookies -- by the way (Thursday, 20 March)
• new cookie draft (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Issues with the cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Issues with the cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Re[2]: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• "DoubleClick Tries to Force Hand into Cookie Jar" (Tuesday, 18 March)
• State Mgmt/RFC 2109 plans (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 issue: Proxy-Authorization (Friday, 14 March)
• HTTP/1.1 issue: Proxy-Authorization (Friday, 14 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: The state of cookies (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: Internet Draft http-versions-00 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: cookies: 2/4 headers? (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: The state of cookies (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: The state of cookies (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: cookies: 2/4 headers? (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: cookies: 2/4 headers? (Saturday, 1 March)
• Re: The state of cookies (Saturday, 1 March)
• Re: Comments on the new cookie draft (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Comments on the new cookie draft (Monday, 24 February)
• LWS in quoted-string (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Comments on the new cookie draft (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Comments on the new cookie draft (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Content encoding problem... (Wednesday, 19 February)
• RFC 2109 on HTTP State Management Mechanism (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Content encoding problem... (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: new prospective cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 February)
• new prospective cookie draft (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 in the news (Monday, 17 February)
• HTTP/1.1 in the news (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: Claification requested in Host: (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: errata for cookie spec (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: errata for cookie spec (Thursday, 13 February)
• errata for cookie spec (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: HTTP events at www6 conference? (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Tuesday, 14 January)
• HTTP/1.1 (RFC 2068) wording nit (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: RFC 2068 and 2069! (Thursday, 2 January)

David Stein

• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Friday, 14 March)

David W. Morris

• Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show? (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Section 10.1.1 Combining Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2 (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt) (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Unidentified subject! (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show? (Tuesday, 25 March)
• On CommentURSs .... (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Section 10.1.1 Combining Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2 (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show? (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: cookie Port summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: RFC2109 addition... (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: RFC2109 addition... (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Section 10.1.1 Combining Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2 (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: RFC2109 addition... (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: new cookie draft (Sunday, 23 March)
• RE: new cookie draft (Sunday, 23 March)
• RE: new cookie draft (Sunday, 23 March)
• RE: new cookie draft (Saturday, 22 March)
• Re: 305 Use proxy (Saturday, 22 March)
• Safe: Yes now, GETWBODY later? [was: Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt] (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: http-equiv and new http headers (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: new cookie draft (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: Secure cookies survey (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: 305 Use proxy (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Issues with the cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Monday, 17 March)
• UA Hint Proposal ... Interim Draft (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 issue: Proxy-Authorization (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Comments on the new cookie draft (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Comments on the new cookie draft (Saturday, 22 February)
• Re: Cookie Question (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: Cookie Question (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Wednesday, 1 January)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Wednesday, 1 January)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Wednesday, 1 January)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Wednesday, 1 January)

Donald Neal

• Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt) (Wednesday, 26 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Fact-checking: do any in-service proxy caches ever ignore (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Fact-checking: do any in-service proxy caches ever ignore Expires? (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: errata for cookie spec (Thursday, 6 February)

DONNY TJANDRA

• Whats servlets for? (Friday, 21 March)

Drazen Kacar

• Re: HTTP version number for 1.1 -> 1.0 responses (Saturday, 4 January)

Dwight Merriman

• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Monday, 17 March)
• Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Friday, 14 March)

Eric Holstege

• Re[2]: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re[2]: errata for cookie spec (Thursday, 6 February)

Erik van der Poel

• Re: SHOULD we include charset=ISO-8859-1? (Wednesday, 19 February)

Falcon

• Secure cookies survey (Friday, 21 March)
• mailto:http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com (Wednesday, 12 March)

Fisher Mark

• Re: errata for cookie spec (Thursday, 6 February)

Foteos Macrides

• Re: Section 10.1.1 Combining Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2 (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: 305 Use proxy (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Issues with the cookie draft (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Issues with the cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: cookies: 2/4 headers? (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: Comments on the new cookie draft (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: Comments on the new cookie draft (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: new prospective cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: A broken browser (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Thursday, 2 January)

Frank Simon

• Re: Cookie Question (Sunday, 16 February)

Fred Douglis

• copyright issues for proxy caches and archival services (Wednesday, 5 March)

ftang@netscape.com

• Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header (Wednesday, 8 January)

Gavin Nicol

• Re: Translated IUC10 Web pages: Experimental Results (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Netscape's Marc Andreessen on Unicode + the Web (Friday, 24 January)

Gordon Strachan

• Semantics of Content-Range in the PUT method (Thursday, 23 January)

Gregory A. Meinke

• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)

Gregory J. Woodhouse

• Re: cookie Port summary (Monday, 24 March)
• PEP and new methods (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Claification requested in Host: (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: draft-ietf-http-versions-00.txt (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: RFC 2068 and 2069! (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Thursday, 2 January)
• A broken browser (Thursday, 2 January)

Hallam-Baker

• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)

Harold A. Driscoll

• Re: Hostile webserver attack!!!! (Saturday, 28 December)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

• Re: pipelining vs. deferred content (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: deflate (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Suggestion: Add Cache-Control extensibility to Vary header (Sunday, 16 March)
• Suggestion: Add Cache-Control extensibility to Vary header (Thursday, 13 March)
• RE: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached (Thursday, 13 March)
• RE: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Request for Input and Progress on PEP draft (Wednesday, 5 March)
• RE: Using of Connection header (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Padding size in chunked encoding (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Content encoding problem... (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Claification requested in Host: (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Content encoding problem... (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Apache Group (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Pipelining and compression effect on HTTP/1.1 proxies (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Content encoding problem... (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 in the news (Tuesday, 18 February)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt (Thursday, 27 March)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-02.txt (Thursday, 27 March)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-rvsa-v10-01.txt (Tuesday, 25 March)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-pep-02.txt (Tuesday, 25 March)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Friday, 21 March)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-uahint-00.txt (Thursday, 20 March)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-warning-00.txt (Thursday, 20 March)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-man-mec-00.txt, .ps (Thursday, 20 March)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-versions-01.txt (Friday, 14 March)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-negotiation-01.txt (Wednesday, 12 March)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-rvsa-v10-00.txt (Tuesday, 11 February)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Tuesday, 11 February)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-errata-00.txt, .ps (Tuesday, 4 February)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-pep-01.txt (Tuesday, 4 February)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-versions-00.txt (Monday, 27 January)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-00.txt (Thursday, 23 January)
• I-D ACTION:draft-http-hit-metering-00.txt (Wednesday, 22 January)

James Marshall

• HTTP tutorial online (1.0 and 1.1) (Monday, 3 March)

James Pitkow

• Re: Comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: Comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Thursday, 6 March)

Jaye, Dan

• Unidentified subject! (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: new cookie draft (Friday, 21 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Saturday, 15 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Friday, 14 March)

Jeff de la Beaujardiere

• Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt) (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: pipelining vs. deferred content (Thursday, 27 March)
• pipelining vs. deferred content (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt) (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt) (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt) (Wednesday, 26 March)

Jeffrey Mogul

• Re: Age Header Field in HTTP/1.1 (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 Issue: max-age in responses not defined (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: pipelining vs. deferred content (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: pipelining vs. deferred content (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: determining proxy reliability (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: determining proxy reliability (Thursday, 20 March)
• determining proxy reliability (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Fact-checking: do any in-service proxy caches ever ignore Expires? (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Confused about persistent connection for old clients (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Fact-checking: do any in-service proxy caches ever ignore Expires? (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: Comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: Comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: The state of cookies (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: Internet Draft http-versions-00 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: Internet Draft http-versions-00 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Now available: extensive HTTP proxy traces from DECWRL (Saturday, 1 March)
• Re: Using of Connection header (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Content encoding problem... (Saturday, 22 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Content encoding problem... (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Ted Hardie's comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-00.txt (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-00.txt (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Ted Hardie's comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Semantics of Content-Range in the PUT method (Tuesday, 28 January)
• I-D ACTION:draft-mogul-http-revalidate-00.txt (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: question on 14.9.4, no-cache directive in requests (Monday, 6 January)
• Re: question on 14.9.4, no-cache directive in requests (Monday, 6 January)
• Re: Cache-Control directive, semantics (Thursday, 2 January)

Jeremey Barrett

• Re: Secure cookies survey (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)

jg@zorch.w3.org

• HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt) (Wednesday, 26 March)
• HTTP/1.1 Issues list (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 in the news (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: Content encoding problem... (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: Cookie Question (Friday, 14 February)
• Content encoding problem... (Friday, 14 February)
• Claification requested in Host: (Friday, 14 February)
• Network Performance Effects of HTTP/1.1, CSS1, and PNG (Monday, 10 February)

Jim Gettys

• Re: New Issue: Incompatiblity between caching needs and persistant connections. (Friday, 21 March)
• Updated issues list... (Thursday, 13 March)

Jim Whitehead

• FYI: New IETF WEBDAV Working Group (Tuesday, 25 March)

Johan Zeeman

• Re: Translated IUC10 Web pages: Experimental Results (Wednesday, 5 February)

John C. Mallery

• RE: Padding size in chunked encoding (Friday, 21 February)

John D. Pritchard

• Re: Hostile webserver attack!!!! (Saturday, 28 December)

John Franks

• Re: pipelining vs. deferred content (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt) (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Padding size in chunked encoding (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: Padding size in chunked encoding (Friday, 21 February)
• Padding size in chunked encoding (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Tuesday, 14 January)
• HTTP version number for 1.1 -> 1.0 responses (Sunday, 29 December)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Wednesday, 1 January)

Jon Crowcroft

• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Sunday, 16 February)

Jonathan Stark

• Re: Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show? (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: On CommentURSs .... (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: RFC2109 addition... (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: RFC2109 addition... (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: RFC2109 addition... (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: RFC2109 addition... (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RFC2109 addition... (Tuesday, 25 March)

Josh

• Re: 305 Use proxy (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: 305 Use proxy (Thursday, 20 March)

Josh Cohen

• Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig (Friday, 28 March)
• ID: Proxy autoconfig (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: 305 Use proxy (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Warning: Rant Enclosed) (Wednesday, 19 March)
• cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• 305 Use proxy (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: What is the basic idea behind 305 Use Proxy? (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Apache and HTTP/1.1 (Thursday, 27 February)

Jurgen Bettels

• Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header (Friday, 10 January)

KCompton@continental.com

• RE: 305 Use proxy (Monday, 24 March)
• RE: 305 Use proxy (Thursday, 20 March)

Klaus Weide

• Re: 305 Use proxy (Sunday, 23 March)
• RE: Using of Connection header (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Thursday, 20 February)
• Content-Location in HTTP/1.1 text (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Tuesday, 18 February)

Koen Holtman

• Random http-wg statistics (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 Issue: max-age in responses not defined (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: Revised HTTP-WG agenda for April 7 (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Revised HTTP-WG agenda for April 7 (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show? (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: cookie Port summary (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Process for closing out issues list (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Issues with the cookie draft (Monday, 24 March)
• Some issues for the list (Sunday, 23 March)
• Re: 305 Use proxy (Sunday, 23 March)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Sunday, 23 March)
• Transparent content negotiation pointers & status (Sunday, 23 March)
• Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: new cookie draft (Thursday, 20 March)
• ID: wildcards in Accept-Charset (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Cookies and cache (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Suggestion: Add Cache-Control extensibility to Vary header (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Suggestion: Add Cache-Control extensibility to Vary header (Sunday, 16 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Sunday, 16 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: What method for Location? (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: Comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Sunday, 9 March)
• New content negotiation draft available (Sunday, 9 March)
• Re: cookies: 2/4 headers? (Sunday, 2 March)
• Re: The state of cookies (Sunday, 2 March)
• Re: cookies: 2/4 headers? (Saturday, 1 March)
• Some edits to draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Cookies in the news (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Ted Hardie's comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Sunday, 23 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-00.txt (Sunday, 23 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-00.txt (Sunday, 23 February)
• Re: Ted Hardie's comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Sunday, 23 February)
• Re: Content encoding problem... (Saturday, 22 February)
• Re: Comments on the new cookie draft (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Questions on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Negotiation comments (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Calendaring Interoperability over HTTP (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 in the news (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 in the news (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 in the news (Monday, 17 February)
• Comments on draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-00.txt (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: HTTP WG status, scheduling (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: Content encoding problem... (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: Cookie Question (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: errata for cookie spec (Friday, 14 February)
• Erratum for draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: errata for cookie spec (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PEP draft for review] (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: errata for cookie spec (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PEP draft for review] (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: PEP draft for review (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: errata for cookie spec (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: errata for cookie spec (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: Content ranges in HTTP/1.1 (Wednesday, 5 February)
• New content negotiation drafts available (Wednesday, 5 February)
• HTTP events at www6 conference? (Monday, 3 February)
• draft-mogul-http-revalidate-00.txt (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Monday, 20 January)
• Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Saturday, 4 January)
• Re: The problem with proxy-revalidate, and a proposed solution (Friday, 27 December)
• Re: Warnings, RFC 1522, and ISO-8859-1 (Friday, 27 December)
• Re: HTTP response version, again (Friday, 27 December)
• Re: Cache-Control directive, semantics (Wednesday, 1 January)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Wednesday, 1 January)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Wednesday, 1 January)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Wednesday, 1 January)

Kolics Bertold, University of Veszprem

• Re: pipelining vs. deferred content (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 Issue: max-age in responses not defined (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Confused about persistent connection for old clients (Sunday, 16 March)
• Re: Fact-checking: do any in-service proxy caches ever ignore Expires? (Saturday, 15 March)
• What is the basic idea behind 305 Use Proxy? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Saturday, 15 February)

Larry Masinter

• System management of HTTP clients (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Revised HTTP-WG agenda for April 7 (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: RFC2109 addition... (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Process for closing out issues list (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Issues with the cookie draft (Sunday, 23 March)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Saturday, 22 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Warning: Rant Enclo sed) (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Issues with the cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Issues with the cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Agenda for HTTP working group April 7 (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Sunday, 16 March)
• IETF HTTP-WG agenda (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: Comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: The state of cookies (Sunday, 2 March)
• The state of cookies (Saturday, 1 March)
• [Fwd: SEC - Protocol names for security protocols] (Friday, 28 February)
• Memphis scheduling (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Comments on the new cookie draft (Wednesday, 26 February)
• hit metering: wait until next draft? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Ted Hardie's comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: SHOULD we include charset=ISO-8859-1? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Ted Hardie's comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: HTTP WG status, scheduling (Sunday, 16 February)
• revised HTTP-WG charter (Sunday, 16 February)
• HTTP WG status, scheduling (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: errata for cookie spec (Saturday, 8 February)
• Cache-control: proxy-maxage as MUST for HTTP/1.1? (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: HTTP events at www6 conference? (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: HTTP events at www6 conference? (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: A broken browser (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: RFC 2068 and 2069! (Thursday, 2 January)
• RFC 2068 and 2069! (Thursday, 2 January)

Lou Montulli

• Re: The state of cookies (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: new prospective cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 February)

Luigi Rizzo

• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Saturday, 15 February)
• How to add new "protocols" ? (Friday, 14 February)

M. Hedlund

• Re: RFC2109 addition... (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: RFC2109 addition... (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Issues with the cookie draft (Sunday, 23 March)
• RE: Issues with the cookie draft (Saturday, 22 March)
• RE: new cookie draft (Saturday, 22 March)
• RE: Issues with the cookie draft (Saturday, 22 March)
• RE: new cookie draft (Saturday, 22 March)
• Re: new cookie draft (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Issues with the cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Monday, 17 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Friday, 14 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: A broken browser (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Thursday, 2 January)

M.T. Carrasco Benitez

• Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header (Wednesday, 15 January)

Marc Salomon

• Re: errata for cookie spec (Friday, 7 February)

Marc Slemko

• Re: Apache and HTTP/1.1 (Wednesday, 19 February)

Martin J. Duerst

• Re: Metadata proliferation (Sunday, 9 March)
• Re: Translated IUC10 Web pages: Experimental Results (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: A broken browser (Monday, 20 January)
• Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Wednesday, 8 January)

Matt Bookman

• Content ranges in HTTP/1.1 (Tuesday, 4 February)

Matthew Rubenstein

• RE: Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show? (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Cookie Question (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: errata for cookie spec (Thursday, 6 February)

Maurizio Codogno

• Accept-Language prefix matching (was: A broken browser) (Thursday, 9 January)

Meraj

• Hello! (Wednesday, 8 January)

Mike Meyer

• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Tuesday, 14 January)

Misha Wolf

• Metadata proliferation (Saturday, 8 March)
• Call for Papers - 11th Unicode Conference - September 1997, California (Friday, 7 March)
• Unicode Conference - Final Reminder (Thursday, 27 February)
• SHOULD we include charset=ISO-8859-1? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Translated IUC10 Web pages: Experimental Results (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Web pages in twenty languages + Unicode (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Unicode Conference - March 1997 - Reminder (Monday, 3 February)
• Netscape's Marc Andreessen on Unicode + the Web (Thursday, 23 January)
• Tenth Int'l Unicode Conference - March 1997 (Thursday, 9 January)

mpresler@us.ibm.com

• Re: Confused about persistent connection for old clients (Tuesday, 18 March)

Natchu Vishnu Priya

• New Issue: Incompatiblity between caching needs and persistant connections. (Friday, 21 March)

nemo/Joel N. Weber II

• Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig (Thursday, 27 March)
• deflate (Thursday, 20 March)

Pat La Claire

• RE: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Tuesday, 14 January)
• RE: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Thursday, 2 January)

Patrick McManus

• Re: deflate (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: determining proxy reliability (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: determining proxy reliability (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt (Tuesday, 18 March)
• draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)

Paul Hethmon

• Re: Semantics of Content-Range in the PUT method (Thursday, 23 January)

Paul Leach

• RE: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Thursday, 2 January)

Paul Sutton

• Questions on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Thursday, 20 February)
• Negotiation comments (Wednesday, 19 February)

Phillip Lindsay

• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)

Phillip M. Hallam-Baker

• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Padding size in chunked encoding (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: Padding size in chunked encoding (Friday, 21 February)

Pixieo2@aol.com

• Re: On CommentURSs .... (Wednesday, 26 March)

Rich Salz

• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Thursday, 20 February)

rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com

• Re: Comments on the new cookie draft (Monday, 24 February)
• Apache and HTTP/1.1 (Friday, 21 February)
• Content encoding problem... (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Wednesday, 29 January)

Rob Hartill

• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Sunday, 16 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Sunday, 16 March)
• Re: A broken browser (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: A broken browser (Thursday, 2 January)

Rodent of Unusual Size

• Re: Cookie Question (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: errata for cookie spec (Thursday, 6 February)

Rohit Khare

• Re: PEP and new methods (Wednesday, 19 February)

Ross Patterson

• Re: cookie Port summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: new cookie draft (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: pipelining vs. deferred content (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: Age Header Field in HTTP/1.1 (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 Issue: max-age in responses not defined (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 Issue: max-age in responses not defined (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: Suggestion: Add Cache-Control extensibility to Vary header (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 Issue: max-age in responses not defined (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: HTTP/1.1 Issue: max-age in responses not defined (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Age Header Field in HTTP/1.1 (Wednesday, 26 March)
• HTTP/1.1 Issue: max-age in responses not defined (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: 305 Use proxy (Sunday, 23 March)
• Re: new cookie draft (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: http-equiv and new http headers (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Fact-checking: do any in-service proxy caches ever ignore (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: 305 Use proxy (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: What method for Location? (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: Content encoding problem... (Saturday, 22 February)
• Re: Content encoding problem... (Saturday, 22 February)
• Re: Content encoding problem... (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Claification requested in Host: (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Claification requested in Host: (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Claification requested in Host: (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Apache and HTTP/1.1 (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Content encoding problem... (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Content-Location in HTTP/1.1 text (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Content encoding problem... (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: Claification requested in Host: (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: origin server vs. proxy with full URL (Saturday, 28 December)

S.N.Brodie@ecs.soton.ac.uk

• Re: errata for cookie spec (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version (Wednesday, 15 January)

Scott Lawrence

• 1.1 server available for testing (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Authentication-Info in Chunked Footer (Monday, 3 March)
• Authentication-Info in Chunked Footer (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: Comments on the new cookie draft (Monday, 24 February)

Shel Kaphan

• RE: Issues with the cookie draft (Sunday, 23 March)

Simon Spero

• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Wednesday, 19 February)

sonipm@audiophile.com

• mailto:http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com (Wednesday, 12 March)

Steve Hanna

• Calendaring Interoperability over HTTP (Tuesday, 11 February)

Steve Madere

• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)

Steve Wingard

• Re: Cookie Question (Friday, 14 February)

Steven Ball

• Re: Persistent connections: current implementations? (Monday, 3 February)

Steven Sajous

• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)

Stuart Kwan

• RE: ID: Proxy autoconfig (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig (Friday, 28 March)

Ted Hardie

• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: Comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Unidentified subject! (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: Hit-meter draft (was Unidentified subject!) (Friday, 31 January)

touch@isi.edu

• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Claification requested in Host: (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Claification requested in Host: (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Claification requested in Host: (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Claification requested in Host: (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Claification requested in Host: (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: How to add new "protocols" ? (Friday, 14 February)

urbani@ares.mctel.fr

• Using of Connection header (Tuesday, 25 February)

Vinod Valloppillil

• RE: ID: Proxy autoconfig (Friday, 28 March)
• RE: Cookies and cache (Tuesday, 18 March)

Walter Ian Kaye

• Re: Metadata proliferation (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: Metadata proliferation (Saturday, 8 March)

wyllys@reston.ans.net

• Re: HTTP/1.1 issue: Proxy-Authorization (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Cookie Question (Friday, 14 February)
• Cookie Question (Friday, 14 February)

Yaron Goland

• RE: Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show? (Wednesday, 26 March)
• RE: RFC2109 addition... (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show? (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Section 10.1.1 Combining Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2 (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: RFC2109 addition... (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: cookie Port summary (Monday, 24 March)
• RE: cookie Port summary (Monday, 24 March)
• RE: new cookie draft (Monday, 24 March)
• RE: new cookie draft (Sunday, 23 March)
• RE: Issues with the cookie draft (Sunday, 23 March)
• RE: Issues with the cookie draft (Sunday, 23 March)
• RE: new cookie draft (Sunday, 23 March)
• RE: new cookie draft (Saturday, 22 March)
• RE: Issues with the cookie draft (Saturday, 22 March)
• RE: new cookie draft (Saturday, 22 March)
• RE: new cookie draft (Friday, 21 March)
• RE: Issues with the cookie draft (Friday, 21 March)
• RE: new cookie draft (Friday, 21 March)
• RE: Issues with the cookie draft (Friday, 21 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Warning: Rant Enclo sed) (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Issues with the cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Issues with the cookie draft (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Friday, 14 March)
• RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Friday, 14 March)
• RE: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached (Thursday, 13 March)
• RE: URI or URL? [was: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached] (Wednesday, 12 March)
• RE: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached (Wednesday, 12 March)
• RE: The state of cookies (Wednesday, 5 March)
• RE: Comments on the new cookie draft (Thursday, 27 February)
• RE: Comments on the new cookie draft (Wednesday, 26 February)
• RE: Using of Connection header (Tuesday, 25 February)
• RE: Content encoding problem... (Saturday, 22 February)
• RE: Comments on the new cookie draft (Saturday, 22 February)
• RE: Comments on the new cookie draft (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: Apache Group (Friday, 21 February)
• Comments on the new cookie draft (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: Apache Groupy (Thursday, 20 February)
• RE: Content encoding problem... (Sunday, 16 February)

Yuan John Jiang

• Re: What method for Location? (Wednesday, 12 March)
• What method for Location? (Tuesday, 11 March)

Last message date: Monday, 31 March 1997 20:46:58 UTC