W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 1997

Re: Confused about persistent connection for old clients

From: <mpresler@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 08:01:10 -0500
To: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <5040100002019705000002L052*@MHS>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/2696
Prologue: MPRESLER@IBMUSM20 (inside IBM)
mpresler@us.ibm.com (outsite IBM)
Epilogue: "Be excellent to each other." -- A. Lincoln

>Because it was recognized during the HTTP/1.1 design process that
>the uncontrolled forwarding of HTTP/1.0 + Keep-Alive requests
>through proxies (especially multiple levels of proxies) could lead
>to confusing communication failures.  See the first paragraph
>of 19.7.1, which explains this.

 OK, I can understand this; I can certainly see problems with this when using
older proxies like CERN httpd. To ask the question differently, though, what's
current practice? What do existing proxy servers do? If you'd like, e-mail to
mpresler@us.ibm.com, and I'll summarize.

 IBM's proxy product does not support Keep-Alives from HTTP/1.0 clients. Our
content (origin) server does support them.

 -- Martin
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 1997 10:01:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:01 UTC