- From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 21:26:35 +0100 (MET)
- To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
- Cc: masinter@parc.xerox.com, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Jeffrey Mogul:
>
> I think you will do yourself and the IESG a service by identifying
> in the document itself the ways in which it is controversial,
> and at least mentioning the alternatives that have been proposed
> ("statistical sampling") even though not explored.
>
>I would be happy to cite, in the next revision of the hit-metering
>draft, any documents that specify alternative proposals.
Two pretty comprehensive references:
http://www2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu/novak/web.standards/webstand.html
http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Demographics/
Some specific proposals:
http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Demographics/Proposals.html
http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/TR/WD-proxy.html
Koen.
Received on Sunday, 23 February 1997 12:29:12 UTC