- From: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 15:31:17 -0800
- To: 'Dave Kristol' <dmk@research.bell-labs.com>, "'Joel N. Weber II'" <nemo@koa.iolani.honolulu.hi.us>
- Cc: "'http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com'" <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "'www-talk@www10.w3.org'" <www-talk@www10.w3.org>
>---------- >From: Joel N. Weber II[SMTP:nemo@koa.iolani.honolulu.hi.us] >Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 1996 12:45 PM >To: Dave Kristol >Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com; www-talk@www10.w3.org >Subject: Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version > >There's no reason I see that it's nessisary to send HTTP/1.1 headers >in response to HTTP/1.0 requests. Yes there is. Suppose there is a 1.0 proxy in between a 1.1 client and server -- the server definitely may want to include Cache-Control headers to optimize the caching in the (potentially) 1.1 client, but the server will see 1.0 in the request because of the 1.0 proxy. Paul
Received on Thursday, 2 January 1997 16:02:31 UTC