RE: new cookie draft

At 1:39 AM -0800 3/22/97, Yaron Goland wrote:
>Cool. David, what do you think? We define PORT. If it is included then
>the cookie may only be returned on the port it is received. If it is not
>included then the cookie may be returned on any port within the domain.

Sounds reasonable to me.

At the risk of complexifying things, should Port perhaps take a
comma-separated list of ports to which the cookie can be sent, rather than
just to the port from which it came?  That would provide a middle ground
between one port and all.

Dave Kristol

Received on Saturday, 22 March 1997 12:53:52 UTC