- From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 1997 01:39:19 -0800
- To: "'hedlund@best.com'" <hedlund@best.com>
- Cc: 'Dave Kristol' <dmk@bell-labs.com>, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Cool. David, what do you think? We define PORT. If it is included then the cookie may only be returned on the port it is received. If it is not included then the cookie may be returned on any port within the domain. Yaron > -----Original Message----- > From: M. Hedlund [SMTP:hedlund@best.com] > Sent: Friday, March 21, 1997 7:27 PM > To: Yaron Goland > Cc: 'Dave Kristol'; http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com > Subject: RE: new cookie draft > > > On Fri, 21 Mar 1997, Yaron Goland wrote: > > We can > > define an attribute "PORT", with no argument. If it is included in a > > cookie then the cookie may only be returned on the port it was > received > > on, this requirement applies to all domains. > > That sounds right. > > M. Hedlund <hedlund@best.com>
Received on Saturday, 22 March 1997 01:40:49 UTC