W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 1997

Re: Cache-Control directive, semantics

From: Anselm Baird_Smith <abaird@www43.inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 13:01:12 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199701061201.NAA12244@www43.inria.fr>
To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/2259
Jeffrey Mogul writes:
 > ...
 > Putting it all together, the "sufficiently fresh" function
 > would be
 >     SuffFresh(Ae, Ap, Ar, Sr, Fr) := min(Ap, Ar) < (Ae + Fr - Sr)

Looks fine...

 > Regarding your second table, which indicates whether a cache
 > entry is usable with or without revalidation, I think we first
 > need to nail down the semantics of "proxy-revalidate".

Yes, I would very much like to consider also the cases of "private
disconnected" and "shared disconnected" caches (for which I have left
the table blank).

Let me know if I can help,
Received on Monday, 6 January 1997 04:09:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:01 UTC