- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 11:48:34 -0400
- To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Hi HTTP WG folks, I haven't participated in this forum for a while, but... I'm back. For your review, I have: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Protocols/PEP/draft-ietf-http-pep-01.txt I prepared an HTML version of the draft as well. I think it might be more clear and easier to read for some folks: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/TR/WD-http-pep-970131 I sent it to the internet drafts editor (with a copy to the WG chair) last friday. So I did meet the 1 Feb milestone. Anyway... I guess it will be coming out the traditional channels any day now. I'm particularly interested in feedback from anybody who tried to implement the August PEP draft. This one is a bit less ambitious -- I scaled it back to the stuff we had implemented, and moved some issues to a "future work" section. Larry had some comments about splitting the requirements out into a separate document. It's more work for me as editor, so I'm against it by default. But I'm just the editor, so whatever you like... Dan
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 1997 08:03:18 UTC