Hi HTTP WG folks, I haven't participated in this forum for a while, but... I'm back. For your review, I have: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Protocols/PEP/draft-ietf-http-pep-01.txt I prepared an HTML version of the draft as well. I think it might be more clear and easier to read for some folks: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/TR/WD-http-pep-970131 I sent it to the internet drafts editor (with a copy to the WG chair) last friday. So I did meet the 1 Feb milestone. Anyway... I guess it will be coming out the traditional channels any day now. I'm particularly interested in feedback from anybody who tried to implement the August PEP draft. This one is a bit less ambitious -- I scaled it back to the stuff we had implemented, and moved some issues to a "future work" section. Larry had some comments about splitting the requirements out into a separate document. It's more work for me as editor, so I'm against it by default. But I'm just the editor, so whatever you like... DanReceived on Tuesday, 4 February 1997 08:03:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:01 UTC