Re: Ted Hardie's comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt

    I think you will do yourself and the IESG a service by identifying
    in the document itself the ways in which it is controversial,
    and at least mentioning the alternatives that have been proposed
    ("statistical sampling") even though not explored.
I would be happy to cite, in the next revision of the hit-metering
draft, any documents that specify alternative proposals.  If anyone
has written such a document, please send the citation information
to me as soon as possible.


Received on Tuesday, 18 February 1997 17:52:54 UTC