W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 1997

Re: Ted Hardie's comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt

From: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 97 17:40:43 PST
Message-Id: <9702190140.AA26277@acetes.pa.dec.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/2449
    I think you will do yourself and the IESG a service by identifying
    in the document itself the ways in which it is controversial,
    and at least mentioning the alternatives that have been proposed
    ("statistical sampling") even though not explored.
I would be happy to cite, in the next revision of the hit-metering
draft, any documents that specify alternative proposals.  If anyone
has written such a document, please send the citation information
to me as soon as possible.

Received on Tuesday, 18 February 1997 17:52:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:01 UTC