At 04:01 PM 3/12/97 -0800, Yaron Goland wrote: >2. Henrik, I'm worried there may have been some miscommunication here. I >do not think the spec made the wrong choice in using the mangled method >names. I do not believe there is any realistic way to avoid it. My HTTP >2.0 comment was a lament that until that far off day comes when HTTP 2.0 >is implemented, we will have to use the method mangle. Sorry - I should have added some :-)s I didn't consider this as a serious alternative. Who wants HTTP/2.0 when we have PEP anyway??? Henrik -- Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, <frystyk@w3.org> World Wide Web Consortium, MIT/LCS NE43-346 545 Technology Square, Cambridge MA 02139, USAReceived on Wednesday, 12 March 1997 18:08:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:01 UTC