W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 1997

Re: draft-ietf-http-versions-00.txt

From: Gregory J. Woodhouse <gjw@wnetc.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 06:52:40 -0800 (PST)
To: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Cc: HTTP WG Mailing List <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.SGI.3.95.970131064619.29133B-100000@shellx.best.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/2315
Even though this document doesn't exactly correspond to my interpretation
of RFC 2068, it addresses my biggest concern simply by making the meaning
of the response version explicit.

---
gjw@wnetc.com    /    http://www.wnetc.com/home.html
If you're going to reinvent the wheel, at least try to come
to come up with a better one.
Received on Friday, 31 January 1997 07:06:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:01 UTC