www-ws-arch@w3.org from June 2002 by author

Abbie Barbir

• RE: D-AR006.6 proposal (Tuesday, 11 June)
• RE: D-AR006.6 proposal (Sunday, 9 June)
• RE: [D-AC021] New internationalization requirement (Thursday, 6 June)

Ahmed, Zahid

• RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step? (Wednesday, 19 June)

Alan Davies

• RE: D-AC007 & D-AC007.1: "Reliable" architecture (Friday, 21 June)

Anne Thomas Manes

• RE: [RTF]First Meeting agenda (Tuesday, 4 June)

Austin, Daniel

• RE: UML (Thursday, 13 June)
• RE: [D-AC021] New internationalization requirement (Thursday, 6 June)
• June 5th draft of requirements document (Thursday, 6 June)

bhaugen

• Re: D-AR006.6 proposal (Saturday, 8 June)

Chakravarty, Dipto

• RE: Regrets for 6/27 and 7/4 telecon (Wednesday, 19 June)

Champion, Mike

• RE: Late binding (Sunday, 30 June)
• RE: Tool support goal (Friday, 28 June)
• RE: Semantics goal (Friday, 28 June)
• RE: Tool support goal (Friday, 28 June)
• RE: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services? (Monday, 17 June)
• RE: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services? (Friday, 14 June)
• RE: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services? (Friday, 14 June)
• RE: proposals without much pushback (Friday, 7 June)
• RE: Suggestion for AC009 (Sunday, 2 June)
• RE: D-AC010.1 proposal (Sunday, 2 June)
• RE: D-AC010.1 proposal (Saturday, 1 June)

Christopher B Ferris

• RE: new version of requirements draft available (Monday, 24 June)
• new version of requirements draft available (Monday, 24 June)

Christopher Ferris

• transcribed flip charts from June 2002 f2f (Thursday, 20 June)
• Fwd: [RTF] meeting notes for 06/18/02 (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: D-AC0505 through D-AC0508..... (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: D-AR006.6 proposal (Saturday, 8 June)
• initial stab at outline of Arch doc from editors (Thursday, 6 June)
• [USTF] con-call minutes (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: proposals without much pushback (Thursday, 6 June)
• [Fwd: FW: D-AC0505 through D-AC0508.....] (Thursday, 6 June)
• proposals without much pushback (Thursday, 6 June)
• D-AR006.6 proposal (Thursday, 6 June)
• editor's drafts of documents for f2f available (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Suggestion for AC009 (Sunday, 2 June)
• D-AC010.1 proposal (Saturday, 1 June)

Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)

• RE: Late binding (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: Late binding (Tuesday, 25 June)
• RE: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004 (Tuesday, 25 June)
• RE: new version of requirements draft available (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usag e S cen arios document) (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: new version of requirements draft available (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step? (Thursday, 20 June)
• [USTF]EDI-like Usage Case - XMLSpec Version (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: D-AC0505 through D-AC0508..... (Saturday, 15 June)
• RE: D-AR006.6 proposal (Saturday, 8 June)

Damodaran, Suresh

• [RTF] Meeting Notes June 25, 2002 (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenar i o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usag e S cen arios document) (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usag e S cen arios document) (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage S cen arios document) (Saturday, 22 June)
• RE:[RTF] proposed AC018 rewording (Friday, 21 June)
• RE: [RTF]Proposal for AC019 (Friday, 21 June)
• [RTF]Proposal for AC019 (Friday, 21 June)
• RE: D-AC007 & D-AC007.1: "Reliable" architecture (Friday, 21 June)
• RE: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage S cen arios document) (Friday, 21 June)
• RE:S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenario s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage Scen arios document) (Friday, 21 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• [RTF] Proposal on D-AC012 to WSAWG (Wednesday, 19 June)
• [RTF] Proposal on D-AC008 to WSAWG (Wednesday, 19 June)
• [RTF] Tentative Proposal on D-AG002 to WSAWG (Wednesday, 19 June)
• [RTF] Proposal on D-AC005 to WSAWG (Wednesday, 19 June)
• [RTF] Proposal on D-AC007 to WSAWG (Wednesday, 19 June)
• [RTF] Meeting Summary June 18, 2002 (Wednesday, 19 June)
• [RTF] Rewording D-AG002 & D-AC007 (Tuesday, 18 June)
• [RTF]First Meeting Notes (Tuesday, 4 June)
• [RTF]First Meeting agenda (Tuesday, 4 June)
• RE: New top goal proposal: Management and SLA (Monday, 3 June)
• [RTF] Plan of action & background (Sunday, 2 June)
• RE: New top goal proposal: Management and SLA (Sunday, 2 June)

Darran Rolls

• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step? (Wednesday, 19 June)

Dave Hollander

• RE: UML (Thursday, 13 June)

David Booth

• Semantic Web presentation from Paris F2F meeting (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Aims and Objectives (Thursday, 20 June)

David Orchard

• RE: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004 (Tuesday, 25 June)
• RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Addressing Orchestration (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Aims and Objectives (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: D-AC010.1 proposal (Sunday, 2 June)

Dilber, Ayse, ALASO

• RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step? (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: D-AR006.6 proposal (Saturday, 8 June)
• RE: [RTF]First Meeting agenda (Tuesday, 4 June)
• RE: New top goal proposal: Management and SLA (Monday, 3 June)

Dournaee, Blake

• SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: What do we have now? (Thursday, 20 June)

ECKERT,ZULAH (HP-Cupertino,ex1)

• Call for volunteers to gather and edit use cases (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• Regrets for 6/27 and 7/4 telecon (Wednesday, 19 June)
• proposed AC018 rewording (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Web services architecture document discussion (continued from F2F ) (Tuesday, 18 June)

Edgar, Gerald

• RE: D-AR006.6 proposal (Thursday, 13 June)

Edwin Khodabakchian

• RE: Late binding (Monday, 1 July)
• RE: Late binding (Monday, 1 July)
• RE: Late binding (Sunday, 30 June)
• RE: Addressing Orchestration (Wednesday, 19 June)

Eric Newcomer

• RE: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services? (Sunday, 16 June)

Francis McCabe

• Re: Semantics goal (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: Tool support goal (Friday, 28 June)
• Tool support goal (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Semantics goal (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Service composition (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Peer to Peer Goal (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Aims and Objectives (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Aims and Objectives (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Semantics critical success factor (Thursday, 6 June)
• D-AR-020.2 Suggestion (Saturday, 1 June)
• D-AR-020.2 Suggestion (Saturday, 1 June)

Hao He

• RE: [RTF]Proposal for AC019 (Friday, 21 June)
• RE: D-AC007 & D-AC007.1: "Reliable" architecture (Friday, 21 June)
• RE: D-AC007 & D-AC007.1: "Reliable" architecture (Friday, 21 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Friday, 21 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• UML (Thursday, 13 June)
• RE: New top goal proposal: Management and SLA (Wednesday, 5 June)
• RE: New top goal proposal: Management and SLA (Tuesday, 4 June)
• RE: New top goal proposal: Management and SLA (Sunday, 2 June)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

• RE: Late binding (Tuesday, 25 June)

Hugo Haas

• Re: Peer to Peer Goal (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: D-AC004 Status (Friday, 28 June)
• AC020.1 and AC020.3: Editorial change requested (Friday, 21 June)
• D-AC007 & D-AC007.1: "Reliable" architecture (Friday, 21 June)
• Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenarios document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenarios document) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenarios document (Thursday, 20 June)
• New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenarios document (Thursday, 20 June)
• Travel agent use case available in XMLSpec format (was Re: [USTF] con-call minutes) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: D-AC010.1 proposal (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [D-AC021] New internationalization requirement (Thursday, 6 June)

Hurley, Oisin

• RE: D-AC0505 through D-AC0508..... (Friday, 14 June)

Igor Gorbunov

• Re: Web Services 2.0? (Monday, 3 June)
• Web Services 2.0? (Monday, 3 June)

Jan Oetting

• life cycle of a web service (Friday, 7 June)

Jeff Mischkinsky

• Re: Late binding (Friday, 28 June)

JEFF.MISCHKINSKY

• Re: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services? (Friday, 14 June)

jones@research.att.com

• RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step? (Thursday, 20 June)

Joseph Hui

• RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: What do we have now? (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: What do we have now? (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: Why GET is an application semantic (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step? (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step? (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: Why GET is an application semantic (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step? (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Why GET is an application semantic (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Why GET is an application semantic (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Why GET is an application semantic (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Why GET is an application semantic (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: D-AR006.6 proposal (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: D-AR006.6 proposal (Saturday, 8 June)

Joseph Reagle

• Re: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step? (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step? (Tuesday, 18 June)

Kakade Mangesh

• Re: UML (Friday, 14 June)

Katia Sycara

• RE: D-AC007 & D-AC007.1: "Reliable" architecture (Saturday, 22 June)
• RE: D-AC007 & D-AC007.1: "Reliable" architecture (Friday, 21 June)
• RE: Aims and Objectives (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: [D-AC021] New internationalization requirement (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: Suggestion for AC009 (Monday, 3 June)
• RE: D-AR003.2 (Saturday, 1 June)

kk@w3.org

• ＊。。連鎖超商邀你加盟。。＊ (Thursday, 27 June)

kreger@us.ibm.com

• Re: Late binding (Friday, 28 June)
• RE: Late binding (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: [RTF] Rewording D-AG002 & D-AC007 (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: [RTF] Rewording D-AG002 & D-AC007 (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services? (Monday, 17 June)
• RE: D-AR006.6 proposal (Tuesday, 11 June)

Krishna Sankar

• RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step? (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on Security Considerations (Monday, 17 June)

Mark Baker

• Email and the Web (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: Late binding (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: Late binding (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: Late binding (Sunday, 30 June)
• Re: Late binding (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: Late binding (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: Late binding (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: Tool support goal (Friday, 28 June)
• Dan Connolly's GET comment (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: Late binding (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004 (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004 (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Late binding (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Late binding (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Late binding (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004 (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Late binding (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Late binding (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004 (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Late binding (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004 (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004 (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Web services architecture document discussion (continued from F2F ) (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage S cen arios document) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage S cen arios document) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenario s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage Scen arios document) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenarios document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenarios document) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: Aims and Objectives (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: Why GET is an application semantic (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: Why GET is an application semantic (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: Why GET is an application semantic (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: Why GET is an application semantic (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Why GET is an application semantic (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Why GET is an application semantic (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Why GET is an application semantic (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services? (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: D-AC0505 through D-AC0508..... (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: Semantics critical success factor (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services? (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services? (Friday, 14 June)
• Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services? (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: UML (Friday, 14 June)
• [me@aaronsw.com: Stock Quotes in RDF] (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: D-AC010.1 proposal (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: Suggestion for AC009 (Monday, 3 June)

Mark Hapner

• Re: Addressing Orchestration (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Aims and Objectives (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services? (Saturday, 15 June)
• Use Case Definition (Thursday, 6 June)

Martin Chapman

• RE: Late binding (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: Addressing Orchestration (Tuesday, 25 June)
• RE: Why GET is an application semantic (Wednesday, 19 June)

MARTIN.CHAPMAN

• Re: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services? (Friday, 14 June)

michael.mahan@nokia.com

• RE: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004 (Thursday, 27 June)
• D-AC004 Status (Thursday, 27 June)
• RE: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004 (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004 (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004 (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004 (Tuesday, 25 June)
• D-AR004.1 proposal (Thursday, 6 June)

Miles Sabin

• Re: Late binding (Sunday, 30 June)
• Re: Late binding (Wednesday, 26 June)

Munter, Joel D

• RE: ws-security specs (Wednesday, 26 June)

Narahari, Sateesh

• RE: Late binding (Friday, 28 June)

Newcomer, Eric

• RE: Late binding (Sunday, 30 June)
• RE: Late binding (Sunday, 30 June)

Paul Denning

• [USTF] notes 2002-06-20 telecon (Thursday, 20 June)

Pete Wenzel

• Re: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: What do we have now? (Friday, 21 June)

rrw

• RE: Late binding (Thursday, 27 June)

Sam

• Re: Late binding (Saturday, 29 June)
• Re: Late binding (Sunday, 30 June)
• Re: Late binding (Saturday, 29 June)
• Re: Late binding (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage S cen arios document) (Monday, 24 June)

Sedukhin, Igor

• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: UML (Thursday, 13 June)
• RE: New top goal proposal: Management and SLA (Wednesday, 5 June)
• RE: New top goal proposal: Management and SLA (Tuesday, 4 June)
• RE: New top goal proposal: Management and SLA (Monday, 3 June)
• RE: New top goal proposal: Management and SLA (Monday, 3 June)

senthilvel

• RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step? (Wednesday, 19 June)

Steven A. Monetti

• RE: proposed AC018 rewording (Friday, 21 June)
• RE: D-AR006.6 proposal (Monday, 10 June)

Ugo Corda

• RE: Addressing Orchestration (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Addressing Orchestration (Wednesday, 19 June)

Venkata Suresh Babu (STP)

• RE: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004 (Wednesday, 26 June)

Vinoski, Stephen

• RE: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services? (Monday, 17 June)

Walden Mathews

• RE: Why GET is an application semantic (Monday, 17 June)

Yin Leng Husband

• RE: [D-AC021] New internationalization requirement (Thursday, 6 June)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 June 2002 21:46:48 UTC