- From: Hao He <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:41:24 +1000
- To: "'Damodaran, Suresh '" <Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com>, "''ECKERT,ZULAH (HP-Cupertino,ex1) ' '" <zulah_eckert@hp.com>, "'''kreger@us.ibm.com' ' '" <kreger@us.ibm.com>, "''Hao.He@thomson.ocm.au ' '" <Hao.He@thomson.ocm.au>, "''adiber@att.com ' '" <adiber@att.com>, "''chrisfer@us.ibm.com' '" <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "'Wsa-public (E-mail) '" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <686B9E7C8AA57A45AE8DDCC5A81596AB019ED79D@sydthqems01.INT.TISA.COM.AU>
hi, Suresh, Looks good. Some comments added. Hao -----Original Message----- From: Damodaran, Suresh To: 'ECKERT,ZULAH (HP-Cupertino,ex1) '; ''kreger@us.ibm.com' '; 'Hao.He@thomson.ocm.au '; 'adiber@att.com '; 'chrisfer@us.ibm.com' Cc: Wsa-public (E-mail) Sent: 6/22/02 7:03 AM Subject: [RTF]Proposal for AC019 Hi all, Below is the new text (including two of the accepted AC019.1 & 19.2 in ballot [1]) for AC019 [2]. Earlier discussions on the topic are in [3]. There are some follow-up discussions to [3], if you really like to dig deeper. I have put in as much as I can think of, and comments, so please excuse me for its bulkiness. Thanks, -Suresh Sterling Commerce [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-arch/2002May/0127.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-wsa-reqs-20020429 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Apr/0019.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ----------------------------------------------------------------- D-AC019 The Web Service Architecture enables conforming Web Services to be reliable, stable, and evolvable over time. AR019.1 Web Services conforming to Web Service Architecture can be reliably discovered, accessed, and executed. [<sd> This was accepted text from the ballot. A potential change preserving the semantics is s/can/MAY </sd>] D-AR019.1.1 If a Web Service is relocated, Web Service Architecture will enable detection of the relocated Web Service. <hh> Since each WS is identified by a URI, is it resonable to ask a WS to keep its URI persistent? If a WS has to change its URI, it should make its old URI available. So, how about adding : "A Web Service should keep its URI persistent." to D-AR019.1.1 </hh> D-AR019.1.2 If a Web Service is not available, Web Service Architecture will enable that information to be conveyed. [<sd> so the service requester does not hang or get time-out exception </sd>] <hh> Is this really necessary and doable? </hh> AR019.2 The Web Service Architecture enables a conforming Web Service implementation to be stable with respect to its definition. [<sd> accepted in the ballot </sd> D-AR019.2.1 A Web Service can be defined independent of its implementation. [<sd> I don't think this is explicitly stated elsewhere. So here it is!</sd>] <hh>This is a good one.</hh> D-AR019.2.2 The functional behavior of two or more web service implementing the same version (see AR019.3.1) of a web service definition is identical. [<sd> the reverse may be true also - two implementations may have the same behavior but different definitions, but is not worth mentioning </sd>] D-AR019.3 The Web Service Architecture enables a conforming Web Service definition to be evolvable. D-AR019.3.1 A Web Service definition includes its version. D-AR019.3.2 A Web Service definition is governed by a well defined versioning scheme (policy) that enables an earlier version of the Web Service definition to be identified, and a corresponding implementation discovered, accessed and executed. [<sd> The versioning info created per versioning scheme will give the Service Requester information on another implemented version that can be executed if necessary </sd>] D-AR019.3.3 The information on the existence of implementations of other versions may be available. The changes in a new Web Service from an earlier version of Web Service may be documented . D-AR019.3.4 If a Web Service Definition evolves into another, the information regarding this evolution may be available.
Attachments
- text/plain attachment: InterScan_Disclaimer.txt
Received on Friday, 21 June 2002 17:40:30 UTC