W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > June 2002

RE: [RTF]Proposal for AC019

From: Hao He <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:41:24 +1000
Message-ID: <686B9E7C8AA57A45AE8DDCC5A81596AB019ED79D@sydthqems01.INT.TISA.COM.AU>
To: "'Damodaran, Suresh '" <Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com>, "''ECKERT,ZULAH (HP-Cupertino,ex1) ' '" <zulah_eckert@hp.com>, "'''kreger@us.ibm.com' ' '" <kreger@us.ibm.com>, "''Hao.He@thomson.ocm.au ' '" <Hao.He@thomson.ocm.au>, "''adiber@att.com ' '" <adiber@att.com>, "''chrisfer@us.ibm.com' '" <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "'Wsa-public (E-mail) '" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
hi, Suresh,

Looks good. Some comments added.


-----Original Message-----
From: Damodaran, Suresh
To: 'ECKERT,ZULAH (HP-Cupertino,ex1) '; ''kreger@us.ibm.com' ';
'Hao.He@thomson.ocm.au '; 'adiber@att.com '; 'chrisfer@us.ibm.com'
Cc: Wsa-public (E-mail)
Sent: 6/22/02 7:03 AM
Subject: [RTF]Proposal for AC019

Hi all,

Below is the new text (including two of the accepted AC019.1 & 19.2  in
ballot [1]) for AC019 [2].
Earlier discussions on the topic are in [3]. There are some follow-up
discussions to [3], if you really like
to dig deeper.
I have put in as much as I can think of, and comments, so please excuse
for its bulkiness.


Sterling Commerce
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-arch/2002May/0127.html 
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-wsa-reqs-20020429
 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Apr/0019.html


	The Web Service Architecture enables conforming Web Services to
reliable, stable, and evolvable over time.
AR019.1 Web Services conforming to Web Service Architecture can be
discovered, accessed, and executed.
[<sd> This was accepted text from the ballot. A potential change
the semantics is s/can/MAY </sd>]
D-AR019.1.1 If a Web Service is relocated, Web Service Architecture will
enable detection of the relocated Web Service.

Since each WS is identified by a URI, is it resonable to ask a WS to keep
URI persistent? If a WS has to change its URI, it should make its old URI
So, how about adding :
"A Web Service should keep its URI persistent."  to D-AR019.1.1 

D-AR019.1.2 If a Web Service is not available, Web Service Architecture
enable that information to be conveyed.
[<sd> so the service requester does not hang or get time-out exception
Is this really necessary and doable?

AR019.2 The Web Service Architecture enables a conforming Web Service
implementation to be stable with respect to its definition.
[<sd> accepted in the ballot </sd>
	D-AR019.2.1 A Web Service can be defined independent of its
	[<sd> I don't think this is explicitly stated elsewhere. So here

<hh>This is a good one.</hh>

D-AR019.2.2 The functional behavior of two or more web service
the same version (see AR019.3.1) of a web service definition is
	[<sd> the reverse may be true also - two implementations may
the same behavior but different definitions, but is not worth mentioning

D-AR019.3 The Web Service Architecture enables a conforming Web Service
definition to be evolvable.
	D-AR019.3.1 A Web Service definition includes its version.
	D-AR019.3.2 A Web Service definition is governed by a well
versioning scheme (policy)  that enables an earlier version of the Web
Service definition to be identified, and a corresponding implementation
discovered, accessed and executed. 
	[<sd> The versioning info created per versioning scheme will
the Service Requester information on another implemented version that
can be
executed if necessary </sd>]
D-AR019.3.3 The information on the existence of implementations of other
versions may be available. The changes in a new Web Service from an
version of Web Service may be documented .
	D-AR019.3.4 If a Web Service Definition evolves into another,
information regarding this evolution may be available.

Received on Friday, 21 June 2002 17:40:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:05:34 UTC