- From: JEFF.MISCHKINSKY <JEFF.MISCHKINSKY@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 01:32:48 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
- To: distobj@acm.org, www-ws-arch@w3.org
> [ snip ] > Going forward, I suggest that this decision has significant > consequences for our work. Primary amoungst them, I believe, is > that the "assumed architecture" that many (most?) WG members have in > mind - the one that looks like OMA/CORBA - does not have very much > to do with Web architecture, and any architectural decisions that > are made assuming that it does, will inevitably meet with objection > from the TAG if we incorporate them into our work. > > I look forward to some discussion on what other WG members thinks > this means for us. Hi Mark, Before I can respond I need to ask you to clarify and describe what it is you think the "assumed architecture" is, what "the web architecture is", and specifically where you think they are incompatible. thx, jeff > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2002May/0018 > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2002Jun/0006 (member > only) [3] > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/06/wd-wsa-reqs-20020605.html#AR003.1 > [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002May/0443 [5] > > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/06/wd-wsa-reqs-20020605.html#AR003.6 > [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002May/0302 > MB > -- > Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) > Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org > http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com > > -- Jeff Mischkinsky jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com Consulting Member Technical Staff +1(650)506-1975 (voice) Oracle Corporation +1(650)506-7225 (fax) 400 Oracle Parkway, M/S 4OP960 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
Received on Friday, 14 June 2002 05:35:18 UTC