RE: proposed AC018 rewording

> From: Darran Rolls [mailto:Darran.Rolls@waveset.com]
[snip]
> Relevant to this discussion, security management needs to be 
> an integral part of both (gosh that helps ;-)

My take is that it should be done in one place, and
referenced (or pointed to) from another.

Joe Hui
Exodus, a Cable & Wireless service
===================================================
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Darran Rolls                      http://www.waveset.com
> Waveset Technologies Inc          drolls@waveset.com 
> (512) 657 8360                    
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:36 AM
> > To: kreger@us.ibm.com
> > Cc: Joseph Hui; ECKERT,ZULAH (HP-Cupertino,ex1); Damodaran, Suresh;
> > Hao.He@thomson.ocm.au; adiber@att.com; wsgeek2002@yahoo.com; www-ws-
> > arch@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: proposed AC018 rewording
> > 
> > 
> > Requiring security to be easily manageable may actually reduce
> security,
> > so I'd personally like to see it in the management goal, not the
> > security goal.
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:57:49AM -0400, kreger@us.ibm.com wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Joe,
> > > I really think that the security management requirement 
> should stay
> with
> > > the security goal.
> > > I thought that was the net of the F2F, but it was hard for me to
> know
> > for
> > > sure.
> > 
> > MB
> > --
> > Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
> > Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
> > http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 20 June 2002 13:48:32 UTC