W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > June 2002

Re: proposed AC018 rewording

From: <kreger@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 13:02:10 -0400
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF4042F234.AA46E065-ON85256BDE.005D5D7B@us.ibm.com>
I don't understand your conclusion.
Why would requiring security to be easily manageable reduce security?  And
what do you mean by reduce security?

Having it be in the management goal does not remove the requirement that
security be manageable.

Heather Kreger
Web Services Lead Architect
STSM, SWG Emerging Technology
919-543-3211 (t/l 441)  cell:919-496-9572

Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>@w3.org on 06/20/2002 12:36:13 PM

Sent by:    www-ws-arch-request@w3.org

To:    Heather Kreger/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc:    Joseph Hui <Joseph.Hui@exodus.net>, "ECKERT,ZULAH (HP-Cupertino,
       ex1)" <zulah_eckert@hp.com>, "Damodaran, Suresh"
       <Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com>, Hao.He@thomson.ocm.au, adiber@att.
       com, wsgeek2002@yahoo.com, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject:    Re: proposed AC018 rewording

Requiring security to be easily manageable may actually reduce security,
so I'd personally like to see it in the management goal, not the
security goal.

On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:57:49AM -0400, kreger@us.ibm.com wrote:
> Joe,
> I really think that the security management requirement should stay with
> the security goal.
> I thought that was the net of the F2F, but it was hard for me to know for
> sure.

Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2002 13:02:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:05:34 UTC