- From: Damodaran, Suresh <Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:13:38 -0500
- To: "'bytecode@Phreaker.net'" <bytecode@Phreaker.net>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Sam, http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/wd-wsawg-scenarios-05012002.html has the WS usage Scenarios. If are enquiring on any other doc. please clarify. Cheers, -Suresh Sterling Commerce -----Original Message----- From: Sam [mailto:bytecode@Phreaker.net] Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 9:13 PM To: www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: Re: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage S cen arios document) Whats the URL to the latest copy of this doc ? Thanks /s Mark Baker wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 07:06:40PM -0500, Damodaran, Suresh wrote: > > Yes, I agree. This truly is the middle ground:-) > > The key is separating the semantics from the protocol. > > Lets hope we do it right. > > I'd say that the key is defining *both* the semantics and the protocol. > Some Internet-scale systems separate the two, such as NFS and DNS (both > are built on an RPC layer). But most don't; they are built with a > single specification, an application protocol. > > MB > -- > Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) > Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org > http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Monday, 24 June 2002 11:14:22 UTC